FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513  
514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   >>   >|  
simply returning to Luther's original doctrine [?], which he never recalled, though he may have modified it a little; the latter is the path pointed out by Melanchthon, and adopted more or less by some of the ablest modern Lutherans." (1, 314. 330.) Prior to Schaff, similar charges had been raised by Planck, Schweizer, Heppe, and others, who maintained that Article XI suffers from a "theological confusion otherwise not found in the _Formula_." Apart from other unwarranted assertions in the passage quoted from Schaff, the chief charges there raised against the _Formula of Concord_ are: 1. that Articles XI and II are contradictory to each other, 2. that the Lutheran Church has failed to harmonize the doctrines of _sola gratia_ and _gratia universalis_. However, the first of these strictures is based on gross ignorance of the facts, resulting from a superficial investigation of the articles involved, for the alleged disagreement is purely imaginary. As a matter of fact, no one can read the two articles attentively without being everywhere impressed with their complete harmony. In every possible way Article XI excludes synergism, and corroborates the _sola gratia_ doctrine of Article II. And Article II, in turn, nowhere denies, rather everywhere, directly or indirectly, confirms, the universal grace particularly emphasized in Article XI. The framers of the _Formula_ were well aware of the fact that the least error in the doctrine of free will and conversion was bound to manifest itself also in the doctrine of election, and that perhaps in a form much more difficult to detect. Hence Article XI was not only intended to be a bulwark against the assaults on the doctrine of grace coming from Calvinistic quarters, but also an additional reenforcement of the article of Free Will against the Synergists, in order to prevent a future recrudescence of their errors in the sphere of predestination. Its object is clearly to maintain the doctrine of the Bible, according to which it is grace alone that saves, a grace which, at the same time, is a grace for all, and thus to steer clear of synergism as well as of Calvinism, and forever to close the doors of the Lutheran Church to every form of these two errors. According to the Second Article, Christians cannot be assured of their election if the doctrine of conversion [by grace alone] is not properly presented. (901, 47. 57.) And Article XI most emphatically supports Article II in it
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513  
514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Article

 

doctrine

 

Formula

 

gratia

 

election

 

Lutheran

 
errors
 

Church

 
synergism
 

articles


conversion

 
Schaff
 
charges
 
raised
 

intended

 
detect
 

difficult

 
original
 

bulwark

 

assaults


additional
 

reenforcement

 

article

 

coming

 

Calvinistic

 

quarters

 

supports

 

framers

 
emphasized
 

confirms


universal

 

manifest

 

recalled

 

emphatically

 

Calvinism

 

forever

 

simply

 

According

 
properly
 
presented

assured
 

Second

 
Christians
 
recrudescence
 

Luther

 
sphere
 

predestination

 

future

 

prevent

 
Synergists