FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125  
126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   >>   >|  
emporaries whom you respect. I do not consider Walter Scott a great poet, but he was highly accomplished in matters of poetical antiquarianism, and is certainly citable as an authority on this question. Try not to be displeased with me. I cannot conceal from you that my astonishment is profound and unutterable at your new religion--your new faith in this pseud-Ossian--and your desecration, in his service, of the old Hellenic altars. And by the way, my own figure reminds me to inquire of you whether you are not sometimes struck with a _want_ in him--a want very grave in poetry, and very strange in antique poetry--the want of devotional feeling and conscience of God. Observe, that all antique poets rejoice greatly and abundantly in their divine mythology; and that if this Ossian be both antique and godless, he is an exception, a discrepancy, a monster in the history of letters and experience of humanity. As such I leave him. Oh, how angry you will be with me. But you seemed tolerably prepared in your last letter for my being in a passion.... Ever affectionately yours, ELIZABETH B. BARRETT. Why should I be angry with Flush? _He_ does not believe in Ossian. Oh, I assure you he doesn't. The following letter was called forth by a criticism of Mr. Kenyon's on Miss Barrett's poem, _The Dead Pan_, which he had seen in manuscript; but it also meets some criticisms which others had made upon her last volume (see above, p. 65). _To John Kenyan_ Wimpole Street: March 25, 1843. My very dear Cousin,--Your kindness having touched me much, and your good opinion, whether literary or otherwise, being of great price to me, it is even with tears in my eyes that I begin to write to you upon a difference between us. And what am I to say? To admit, of course, in the first place, the injuriousness to the 'popularity,' of the scriptural tone. But am I to sacrifice a principle to popularity? Would you advise me to do so? Should I be more worthy of your kindness by doing so? and could you (apart from the kindness) call my refusal to do so either perverseness or obstinacy? Even if you could, I hope you will try a little to be patient with me, and to forgive, at least, what you find it impossible to approve. My dear cousin, if you had not reminded me of Wordsworth's exclamation-- I would rather be A pagan, suckled in a creed outworn-- and if he had never made it, I do think that its significance would have occurre
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125  
126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
kindness
 

antique

 

Ossian

 

letter

 

poetry

 

popularity

 
manuscript
 
occurre
 
touched
 

volume


literary

 

opinion

 

Kenyan

 
Wimpole
 

Cousin

 

Street

 

criticisms

 

significance

 

suckled

 

obstinacy


perverseness

 

refusal

 

patient

 

exclamation

 
impossible
 

Wordsworth

 

approve

 

cousin

 
forgive
 

worthy


reminded

 

difference

 
injuriousness
 

scriptural

 
advise
 

outworn

 

Should

 

sacrifice

 
principle
 

altars


Hellenic
 
figure
 

service

 

desecration

 

reminds

 

inquire

 
conscience
 

feeling

 

Observe

 

devotional