FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104  
105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>   >|  
subscribers would seem to bear a Catholic sense, but which, when worked out on the long run, would prove to be heterodox? Accordingly, there was great antecedent probability, that, fierce as the Articles might look at first sight, their bark would prove worse than their bite. I say antecedent probability, for to what extent that surmise might be true, could only be ascertained by investigation. 3. But a consideration came up at once, which threw light on this surmise:--what if it should turn out that the very men who drew up the Articles, in the very act of doing so, had avowed, or rather in one of those very Articles themselves had imposed on subscribers, a number of those very "Papistical" doctrines, which they were now thought to deny, as part and parcel of that very Protestantism, which they were now thought to consider divine? and this was the fact, and I showed it in my Essay. Let the reader observe:--the 35th Article says: "The second Book of Homilies doth contain _a godly and wholesome doctrine, and necessary for_ these times, as doth the former Book of Homilies." Here the _doctrine_ of the Homilies is recognized as godly and wholesome, and concurrence in that recognition is imposed on all subscribers of the Articles. Let us then turn to the Homilies, and see what this godly doctrine is: I quoted from them to the following effect: 1. They declare that the so-called "apocryphal" book of Tobit is the teaching of the Holy Ghost, and is Scripture. 2. That the so-called "apocryphal" book of Wisdom is Scripture, and the infallible and undeceivable word of God. 3. That the Primitive Church, next to the Apostles' time, and, as they imply, for almost 700 years, is no doubt most pure. 4. That the Primitive Church is specially to be followed. 5. That the Four first General Councils belong to the Primitive Church. 6. That there are Six Councils which are allowed and received by all men. 7. Again, they speak of a certain truth, and say that it is declared by God's word, the sentences of the ancient doctors, and judgment of the Primitive Church. 8. Of the learned and holy Bishops and doctors of the Church of the first eight centuries being of great authority and credit with the people. 9. Of the declaration of Christ and His Apostles and all the rest of the Holy Fathers. 10. Of the authority both of Scripture and also of Augustine. 11. Of Augustine, Chrysostom, Ambrose, Jerome, and about thirty ot
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104  
105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Church

 

Homilies

 

Articles

 

Primitive

 

subscribers

 

Scripture

 
doctrine
 

called

 

doctors

 

apocryphal


wholesome

 

Apostles

 
thought
 

Councils

 

imposed

 

surmise

 

antecedent

 
Augustine
 
probability
 

authority


Fathers

 
Jerome
 

teaching

 
thirty
 
Ambrose
 

undeceivable

 

infallible

 

Wisdom

 
Chrysostom
 

declared


credit

 

sentences

 

judgment

 

Bishops

 

centuries

 

ancient

 

General

 

belong

 

learned

 
specially

received

 
people
 

allowed

 

Christ

 
declaration
 

consideration

 

investigation

 

ascertained

 
avowed
 

extent