FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240  
241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   >>   >|  
| | | | | | Air and | Ground Forces Naval Forces | Air Defense Frontier Troops | Forces | ------------------------+--------------------- | | | Bucharest Garrison Cluj Military Region Iasi Military Region _Figure 10. Romania, Organization of the Armed Forces, 1972._] All commanders and force personnel subordinate to the minister are part of the regular military establishment, although appointments to the higher commands may be determined in varying degrees by political considerations. The minister is a political appointee but, whether or not he has had a military background, he assumes a senior military rank. The Romanian practice deviates from the usual in such situations, however, where the minister is expected to have an actual or honorary rank superior to any officer in his forces. The minister of the armed forces in 1971, for example, was appointed in 1966. He was promoted from colonel general to army general after about four years in his position and, during the early period, was technically subordinate in rank to an army general who commanded the General Military Academy in Bucharest. In 1972 there were about 200,000 men in the regular forces. About 75 percent were in ground force or in support units common to all services. About 5 percent were naval; 10 percent, air force; and the remainder, frontier troops. The air force percentage included air defense forces. When the mission of the armed forces is being described in relation to the Warsaw Pact, it is pointed out that the forces are structured and trained for major operations in concert with their allies against a common enemy. Because organized Romanian forces have not been involved in a major conflict except as junior partners in an alliance force, this experience makes the concept of participation in the Warsaw Pact mission easy to accept. Since about 1960, however, leaders have expressed ambitions to act somewhat independently of the Warsaw Pact. In this context the pact mission is occasionally downgraded or passed over in nonspecific terms. The forces' mission is then described as defense of the country only, and their use is said to be allowable only to resist aggression against Romania. Ground Forc
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240  
241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
forces
 

mission

 

Forces

 

minister

 

Warsaw

 

general

 

military

 

percent

 

Military

 
political

Romanian

 

subordinate

 

Romania

 

regular

 

Ground

 

common

 

Bucharest

 
Region
 
defense
 
remainder

concert

 

percentage

 

allies

 

relation

 

pointed

 

troops

 

frontier

 

trained

 
structured
 

included


operations
 
experience
 

occasionally

 
downgraded
 
passed
 
context
 

independently

 

nonspecific

 
resist
 
aggression

allowable
 

country

 

ambitions

 
expressed
 
junior
 

partners

 

conflict

 

involved

 

Because

 

organized