FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1480   1481   1482   1483   1484   1485   1486   1487   1488   1489   1490   1491   1492   1493   1494   1495   1496   1497   1498   1499   1500   1501   1502   1503   1504  
1505   1506   1507   1508   1509   1510   1511   1512   1513   1514   1515   1516   1517   1518   1519   1520   1521   1522   1523   1524   1525   1526   1527   1528   1529   >>   >|  
r his soul were separated from his body. For he says (2 Cor. 12:2): "I know a man in Christ rapt even to the third heaven." Now man denotes something composed of soul and body; and rapture differs from death. Seemingly therefore he knew that his soul was not separated from his body by death, which is the more probable seeing that this is the common opinion of the Doctors. Obj. 2: Further, it appears from the same words of the Apostle that he knew whither he was rapt, since it was "to the third heaven." Now this shows that he knew whether he was in the body or not, for if he knew the third heaven to be something corporeal, he must have known that his soul was not separated from his body, since a corporeal thing cannot be an object of sight save through the body. Therefore it would seem that he was not ignorant whether his soul were separated from his body. Obj. 3: Further, Augustine says (Gen. ad lit. xii, 28) that "when in rapture, he saw God with the same vision as the saints see Him in heaven." Now from the very fact that the saints see God, they know whether their soul is separated from their body. Therefore Paul too knew this. _On the contrary,_ It is written (2 Cor. 12:3): "Whether in the body, or out of the body, I know not, God knoweth." _I answer that,_ The true answer to this question must be gathered from the Apostle's very words, whereby he says he knew something, namely that he was "rapt even to the third heaven," and that something he knew not, namely "whether" he were "in the body or out of the body." This may be understood in two ways. First, the words "whether in the body or out of the body" may refer not to the very being of the man who was rapt (as though he knew not whether his soul were in his body or not), but to the mode of rapture, so that he ignored whether his body besides his soul, or, on the other hand, his soul alone, were rapt to the third heaven. Thus Ezechiel is stated (Ezech. 8:3) to have been "brought in the vision of God into Jerusalem." This was the explanation of a certain Jew according to Jerome (Prolog. super Daniel.), where he says that "lastly our Apostle" (thus said the Jew) "durst not assert that he was rapt in his body, but said: 'Whether in the body or out of the body, I know not.'" Augustine, however, disapproves of this explanation (Gen. ad lit. xii, 3 seqq.) for this reason that the Apostle states that he knew he was rapt even to the third heaven. Wherefore he
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1480   1481   1482   1483   1484   1485   1486   1487   1488   1489   1490   1491   1492   1493   1494   1495   1496   1497   1498   1499   1500   1501   1502   1503   1504  
1505   1506   1507   1508   1509   1510   1511   1512   1513   1514   1515   1516   1517   1518   1519   1520   1521   1522   1523   1524   1525   1526   1527   1528   1529   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
heaven
 

separated

 
Apostle
 

rapture

 

explanation

 

Therefore

 

corporeal

 
Whether

answer
 
vision
 
saints
 

Augustine

 

Further

 

stated

 

Ezechiel

 

understood


Wherefore

 

brought

 
reason
 

lastly

 
disapproves
 

assert

 

Daniel

 
Christ

Jerusalem
 

states

 

Prolog

 

Jerome

 

Doctors

 
opinion
 

appears

 

ignorant


common

 

object

 

probable

 

differs

 
knoweth
 

Seemingly

 

question

 

composed


gathered

 

written

 
contrary
 
denotes