FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221  
222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   >>  
ion of such sentence. The consequence is, that jurors must have the whole case in their hands, and judge of law, evidence, and sentence, or they incur the moral responsibility of accomplices in any injustice which they have reason to believe will be done by the government on the authority of their verdict. The same principles apply to civil cases as to criminal. If a jury consent, at the dictation of the court, as to either law or evidence, to render a verdict, on the strength of which they have reason to believe that a man's property will be taken from him and given to another, against their own notions of justice, they make themselves morally responsible for the wrong. Every man, therefore, ought to refuse to sit in a jury, and to take the oath of a juror, unless the form of the oath be such as to allow him to use his own judgment, on every part of the case, free of all dictation whatsoever, and to hold in his own hand a veto upon any verdict that can be rendered against a defendant, and any sentence that can be inflicted upon him, even if he be guilty. Of course, no man can rightfully take an oath as juror, to try a case "according to law," (if by law be meant anything other than his own ideas of justice,) nor "according to the law and the evidence, _as they shall be given him_." Nor can he rightfully take an oath even to try a case "_according to the evidence_," because in all cases he may have good reason to believe that a party has been unable to produce all the evidence legitimately entitled to be received. The only oath which it would seem that a man can rightfully take as juror, in either a civil or criminal case, is, that he "will try the case _according to his conscience_." Of course, the form may admit of variation, but this should be the substance. Such, we have seen, were the ancient common law oaths. CHAPTER XI. AUTHORITY OF MAGNA CARTA. Probably no political compact between king and people was ever entered into in a manner to settle more authoritatively the fundamental law of a nation, than was Magna Carta. Probably no people were ever more united and resolute in demanding from their king a definite and unambiguous acknowledgment of their rights and liberties, than were the English at that time. Probably no king was ever more completely stripped of all power to maintain his throne, and at the same time resist the demands of his people, than was John on the 15th day of June, 1215.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221  
222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   >>  



Top keywords:

evidence

 

people

 

Probably

 

rightfully

 

sentence

 

verdict

 
reason
 
justice
 

dictation

 

criminal


CHAPTER

 

common

 

ancient

 

entitled

 

received

 

substance

 

variation

 

conscience

 

political

 
liberties

nation

 

legitimately

 

authoritatively

 

resist

 

fundamental

 

united

 

resolute

 

maintain

 
acknowledgment
 

rights


unambiguous

 

throne

 

demanding

 

definite

 

settle

 
stripped
 

AUTHORITY

 

compact

 

entered

 

manner


English

 
demands
 

completely

 

strength

 

property

 

render

 
consent
 

responsible

 

morally

 
notions