a substitute for more fundamental reforms.
In other words, a rational political standard would teach that a certain
measure of political progress is normal in capitalist society as a
result of the general increase of wealth and the general improvement in
political and economic organization, especially now that the great
change to State capitalism is taking place; while reforms of an entirely
different character are needed if there is to be any relative advance of
the political and economic power of the masses, any tendency that might
lead in the course of a reasonable period of time to economic and social
democracy.
"A new and fair division of the goods and rights of this world should be
the main object of all those who conduct human affairs," said De
Tocqueville. The economic progress and political reforms of this
capitalistic age are doubtless bringing us nearer to the day when a new
and fair division of goods and rights _can_ take place, and they will
make the great transformation easier when it comes, but this does not
mean that in themselves they constitute even a first step in the new
dispensation. That they do is denied by all the most representative
Socialists from Marx to Bebel.
The most bitter opponents of Socialism, like its most thoroughgoing
advocates, have come to see that the whole character of the movement has
grown up from its unwillingness to compromise the aggressive tactics
indispensable for the revolutionary changes it has in view, until it has
become obvious that, _just as Socialism as a social movement is the
opposite pole to State capitalism, so Socialism as a social method is
the opposite pole to opportunism_.
FOOTNOTES:
[93] The Communist Manifesto.
[94] _The Coming Nation_, Sept. 9, 1911.
[95] Mr. Gompers's articles in the _Federationist_ have recently
appeared in book form.
[96] Carl D. Thompson, "The Constructive Program of Socialism"
(pamphlet).
[97] Victor Grayson and G. R. S. Taylor, "The Problem of Parliament," p.
56.
[98] Editorial in the _Socialist Review_ (London), May, 1910.
[99] _Vorwaerts_ (Milwaukee), Jan. 3, 1893.
[100] Edmond Kelly, "Individualism and Collectivism," p. 398.
CHAPTER II
"REFORMISM" IN FRANCE, ITALY, AND BELGIUM
The Socialist parties in Italy, Belgium, and France, where "reformism"
is strong, are progressing less rapidly than the Socialists of these
countries had reason to expect, and far less rapidly than in other
countr
|