FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119  
120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   >>   >|  
tempted murder (_R._ v. _Davies_, 1906, 1 K.B. 32); and in the case of the _Weekly Dispatch_ in 1902 (_R._ v. _Tibbits and Windust_, 1 K.B. 77), two journalists were tried on indictment, and held to have been rightly convicted, for conspiring to prevent the course of justice by publishing matter calculated to interfere with the fair trial of persons who were under accusation. Courts having jurisdiction. "In the superior courts the power of committing for contempt is inherent in their constitution, has been coeval with their original institution and has been always exercised" (Oswald, _On Contempt_, 3). The high court in which these courts are merged is the only court which has a general jurisdiction to deal summarily with all forms of contempt. Each division of that court deals with the particular contempts arising with reference to proceedings before the division; but the king's bench division, in the exercise of the supervisory authority inherited from the old court of king's bench as _custos morum_, also from time to time deals with acts constituting interference with justice in other inferior courts whether of record or not. The nature and limits of this jurisdiction after much discussion have been defined by decisions in 1903 and 1905 in attempts to try by newspapers cases under inquiry by justices or awaiting trial at assizes or quarter sessions. The exercise of this authority in the king's bench division, being in a criminal cause or matter, is not the subject of appeal to any higher court. Inferior courts of record have, as a general rule, power to punish only those contempts which are committed _in facie curiae_ or consist in disobedience to the lawful orders or judgments of the court. For instance, a county court may summarily punish persons who insult the judge or any officer of the court or any juror or witness, or wilfully interrupt the proceedings, or misbehave in the court-house (County Court Act 1888, s. 162), and may also attack persons who having means refuse to comply with an order to pay money, or refuse to comply with an order to deliver up a specific chattel or disobey an injunction. A court of quarter sessions has at common law a like power as to contempts _in facie curiae_ and is said to have power to punish its officials for contempt in non-attendance or neglect of duty. Punishment. Contempt of court is a misdemeanour and is punishable by fine and imprisonment or either at disc
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119  
120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

division

 

courts

 

punish

 

persons

 

contempt

 
contempts
 

jurisdiction

 

quarter

 

refuse

 

sessions


authority
 

Contempt

 

proceedings

 

curiae

 

exercise

 

comply

 

justice

 
record
 

matter

 

summarily


general

 

inquiry

 

judgments

 

lawful

 

orders

 

assizes

 
subject
 
appeal
 

higher

 
Inferior

criminal

 

consist

 

disobedience

 
awaiting
 

committed

 

justices

 

officials

 

common

 
chattel
 

disobey


injunction

 

attendance

 

imprisonment

 

punishable

 

misdemeanour

 

neglect

 
Punishment
 
specific
 

witness

 

wilfully