personal character.
FOOTNOTES:
[464] For an account of these writers and their relation to the
pre-revolutionary schools, see _Les Ideologues_ by F. Picavet (1891).
[465] Macvey Napier's _Correspondence_, p. 424.
[466] Charles Francois Dominique de Villers (1767-1815) was a French
officer, who emigrated in 1792, and took refuge at Luebeck. He became
profoundly interested in German life and literature, and endeavoured
to introduce a knowledge of German speculation to his countrymen. His
chief books were this exposition of Kant and an essay upon the
_Reformation of Luther_ (1803), which went through several editions,
and was translated by James Mill in 1805. An interesting account of
Villers is in the _Biographie Universelle_.
[467] See Cockburn's _Memorials_ for a good notice of this.
[468] Stewart's _Works_, iv. 345.
[469] Lady Holland's _Life of Smith_, ii. 388.
[470] _Inquiry into the Relations of Cause and Effect_ (third
edition), pp. 178, 180, and part iv. sec. 6.
[471] _Examination of Hamilton_ (fourth edition), p. 379.
[472] _Cause and Effect_, pp. 184-87.
[473] _Cause and Effect_, p. 197.
[474] _Ibid._ p. 239 _seq._
[475] _Ibid._ p. 244.
[476] _Ibid._ p. 150.
[477] _Ibid._ p. 357.
[478] _Cause and Effect_, p. 313.
[479] _Cause and Effect_, p. 482. Brown thinks that we can logically
disprove the existence of motion by the hare and tortoise argument,
and should therefore disregard logic.
[480] Brown's _Lectures_, (1851), p. 167, Lect. xxvi.
[481] Lecture xxv. This question as to whether Brown had or had not
grossly misrepresented Reid and other philosophers, led to an
entangled argument, in which Mill defended Brown against Hamilton. I
will not ask whether Reid was a 'natural realist' or a 'cosmothetic
idealist,' or what Descartes or Arnauld thought about the question.
[482] Reid's _Works_, p. 128.
[483] _Lectures_, pp. 150, 158-59.
[484] _Dissertations_, p. 98. Compare Brown's Twenty-fourth Lecture
with Tracy's _Ideologie_, ch. vii., and the account of the way in
which the infant learns from resistance to infer a cause, and make of
the cause _un etre qui n'est pas moi_. The resemblance is certainly
close. Brown was familiar with French literature, and shows it by many
quotations, though he does not, I think, refer to Tracy. Brown, it
must be noticed, did not himself publish his lectures, and a professor
is not bound to give all his sources in popular lectures. An
|