FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79  
80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   >>   >|  
nceivable possibility_ that subsequent investigations will show them to be erroneous or defective. They stand upon a foundation of Proof as unalterable as the fiat of Fate or the decrees of the Almighty, which can neither be shaken nor destroyed. It is between these three Mathematical Sciences, on the one side, and all other domains of intellectual investigation on the other, that a line of distinct demarcation must be drawn, in any Classification of our so-called Knowledge, in accordance with any method of classification known to the scientific world at large. Not that the Laws or Principles which lie at the base of all other departments of the universe are not as stable, as definite, and as infallible as those which inhere in the Sciences which have been specially indicated. But that, as yet, the endeavor to apprehend fundamental Principles, in other spheres than these, has been attended with only partial success; and hence, the ability to establish a Mathematical or Demonstrable basis for other regions of Thought is yet wanting, so far as is commonly known. When, therefore, we emerge from the domains of Mathematics, Astronomy, and Physics, we are leaving the field of _positive assurance_, of _undeniable_ truth, and entering the realms where opinion, conjecture, and variable degrees of certainty prevail. _The Facts of Observation may be, indeed, as plain here as elsewhere and as firmly established. But the conclusions drawn from them, the Scientific Principles assumed to be established, may be erroneous or defective, and the power of prevision, the great test of Scientific accuracy, is proportionally wanting._ Derived, as we have hitherto seen these conclusions to be, from Phenomena, on the supposition that a given range of Observation will secure all the essential Principles which appertain to the _whole_ of the Phenomena included in the range, we can never be _entirely sure_ that our basis of Facts is sufficient for our purpose, and hence the _possibility_ of error always exists. It is not to be understood, therefore, that first or observational _Facts_ are not rightly to be known in other departments of investigation than Mathematics, Astronomy, and Physics; but that Laws, Principles, or Generalizations which _relate_ Facts and serve as instruments for penetrating into the deeper arcana of Nature, cannot be precisely, accurately, and certainly _known_, in their relations and belongings, until we are able to es
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79  
80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Principles

 

investigation

 

established

 

domains

 

departments

 

conclusions

 
Scientific
 

Phenomena

 

Sciences

 

Mathematics


erroneous

 

Physics

 
defective
 

Astronomy

 

Observation

 

wanting

 

possibility

 
Mathematical
 
realms
 

variable


degrees

 
accuracy
 

conjecture

 
opinion
 
assumed
 

firmly

 

proportionally

 

prevail

 
prevision
 

certainty


penetrating

 

deeper

 

arcana

 

instruments

 

Generalizations

 

relate

 

Nature

 

belongings

 

relations

 
precisely

accurately

 
rightly
 

observational

 

essential

 
appertain
 

included

 

secure

 

hitherto

 
supposition
 

entering