FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   >>  
gress might have abolished in such a contingency also. The cession in that case leaving no slaves in those states,--no "good faith," would be "implied" in it, nor any "violated," by an act of abolition. The principle of the resolution makes this further admission, that if Maryland and Virginia should at once abolish their slavery, Congress might at once abolish it in the District. The principle goes even further than this, and _requires_ Congress in such case to abolish slavery in the District "by the _good faith implied_ in the cession and acceptance of the territory." Since, according to the spirit and scope of the resolution, this "implied good faith" of Maryland and Virginia in making the cession, was that Congress would do nothing within the District which should go to counteract the policy, or bring into disrepute the "institutions," or call in question the usages, or even in any way ruffle the prejudices of those states, or do what _they_ might think would unfavorably bear upon their interests; _themselves_ of course being the judges. But let us dissect another limb of the resolution. What is to be understood by "that good faith which was IMPLIED?" It is of course an admission that such a condition was not _expressed_ in the acts of cession--that in their _terms_ there is nothing restricting the power of Congress on the subject of slavery in the District--not a word alluding to it, nor one inserted with such an _intent_. This "implied faith," then, rests on no clause or word in the United States' Constitution, or in the acts of cession, or in the acts of Congress accepting the cession, nor does it rest on any declarations of the legislatures of Maryland and Virginia made at the time, or in that generation, nor on any _act_ of theirs, nor on any declaration of the people of those states, nor on the testimony of the Washingtons, Jeffersons, Madisons, Chaces, Martins, and Jennifers, of those states and times. The assertion rests _on itself alone_! Mr. Clay and the other senators who voted for the resolution, _guess_ that Maryland and Virginia supposed that Congress would by no means _use_ the power given them by the constitution, except in such ways as would be well pleasing in the eyes of those states; especially as one of them was the "Ancient Dominion!" And now after the lapse of half a century, this _assumed expectation_ of Maryland and Virginia, the existence of which is mere matter of conjecture with the 36 s
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   >>  



Top keywords:

Congress

 
cession
 

Virginia

 

states

 
Maryland
 

resolution

 
District
 

implied

 

abolish

 

slavery


admission

 

principle

 

Jennifers

 

Martins

 

people

 

Jeffersons

 

assertion

 
Chaces
 

Madisons

 

Washingtons


testimony
 

clause

 
accepting
 
United
 

Constitution

 

declarations

 

legislatures

 

generation

 
States
 

declaration


Ancient

 
Dominion
 

century

 

assumed

 

conjecture

 

matter

 

expectation

 

existence

 

senators

 

supposed


pleasing

 

constitution

 

making

 

spirit

 

counteract

 
policy
 

question

 
institutions
 

disrepute

 

territory