FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133  
134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   >>   >|  
the Mainotes in Greece, and in certain of the southern states of North America. The obligation or inclination to take vengeance depends on the fact of homicide, and not on the circumstances in which it was committed, i.e. it is a part of the _lex talionis_. The mischief of this system was alleviated under the Levitical law by the creation of cities of refuge, and in Greece and Italy, both in Pagan and Christian times, by the recognition of the right of sanctuary in temples and churches. A second mode of dealing with homicide was that known to early Teutonic and early Celtic law, where the relatives of the deceased, instead of the life of the slayer, received the wer of the deceased, i.e. a payment in proportion to the rank of the slain, and the king received the blood-wite for the loss of his man. But even under this system certain crimes were in Anglo-Saxon law bot-less, i.e. no compensation could be paid, and the offender must suffer the penalty of death. In the laws of Khammurabi, king of Babylon (2285-2242 B.C.), the death penalty is imposed for many offences. The modes for executing it specially named are burning, drowning and impalement (_Oldest Code of Laws_, by C.H.W. Johns, 1903). Under the Roman law, "capital" punishment also included punishments which deprived the offender of the status of Roman citizen (_capitis deminutio, capitis amissio_), e.g. condemnation to servitude in the mines or to deportation to an island (_Dig._ 48. 19). British and foreign laws and methods. _United Kingdom._--The modes of capital punishment in England under the Saxon and Danish kings were various: hanging, beheading, burning, drowning, stoning, and precipitation from rocks. The principle on which this variety depended was that where an offence was such as to entitle the king to outlaw the offender, he forfeited all, life and limb, lands and goods, and that the king might take his life and choose the mode of death. William the Conqueror would not allow judgment of death to be executed by hanging and substituted mutilation; but his successors varied somewhat in their policy as to capital punishment, and by the 13th century the penalty of death became by usage (without legislation) the usual punishment for high and petty treason and for all felonies (except mayhem and petty larceny, i.e. theft of property worth less than 1s.); see Stephen, _Hist. Cr. Law_, vol. i. 458; Pollock and Maitland, _Hist. Eng. Law_, vol. ii. 459. It
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133  
134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

punishment

 

penalty

 

capital

 

offender

 

capitis

 

received

 

hanging

 
burning
 

drowning

 

deceased


homicide
 

Greece

 

system

 

Pollock

 
Maitland
 
Danish
 

United

 

Kingdom

 

England

 

beheading


stoning

 

legislation

 

variety

 

principle

 
precipitation
 

treason

 

servitude

 
condemnation
 

deminutio

 

amissio


deportation

 

British

 

foreign

 

methods

 

island

 

depended

 

executed

 

substituted

 
judgment
 

William


Conqueror

 

policy

 

mutilation

 

larceny

 

varied

 

property

 

successors

 

choose

 
felonies
 

outlaw