FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84  
85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>   >|  
eneral rule, the cross between a male and a female results in the production of the two sexes in approximately equal numbers. The cross between a heterozygous dominant and a recessive also leads to equal numbers of recessives and of heterozygous dominants. Is it not, therefore, possible that one of the sexes is heterozygous for a factor which is lacking in the other, and that the presence or absence of this factor determines the sex of the zygote? The results of some recent experiments would appear to justify this interpretation, at any rate in particular cases. Of these, the simplest is that of the common currant moth (_Abraxas grossulariata_), of which there exists a pale variety (Fig. 17) known as _lacticolor_. The experiments of Doncaster and Raynor showed that the variety behaved as a simple recessive to the normal form. But the distribution of the dominants and {100} recessives [Illustration]with with regard to the sexes was peculiar. The original cross was between a _lacticolor_ female and a normal male. All the F_1 moths of both sexes were of the normal _grossulariata_ type. The F_1 insects were then paired together and gave a generation consisting of 3 normals : 1 _lacticolor_. But all the _lacticolor_ were females, and all the males were of the normal pattern. It was, however, found possible to obtain the _lacticolor male_ by mating a _lacticolor_ female with the F_1 male. The family resulting from this cross consisted of normal males and normal females, _lacticolor_ males and _lacticolor_ females, and the {101} four sorts were produced in approximately equal numbers. In such a family there was no special association of either of the two colour varieties with one sex rather than the other. But the reverse cross, F_1 female by _lacticolor_ male, gave a very different result. As in the previous cross such families contained equal numbers of the normal form and of the recessive variety. But all of the normal _grossulariata_ were males, while all the _lacticolor_ were females. Now this seemingly complex collection of facts is readily explained if we make the following three assumptions:-- [Illustration] (1) The _grossulariata_ character (G) is dominant to the lacticolor character (g). This is obviously justified by the experiments, for, leaving the sex distribution out of account, we get the expected 3 : 1 ratio from F_1 x F_1, and also the expected ratio of equality when the heterozygote is crossed with the re
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84  
85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

lacticolor

 
normal
 

grossulariata

 

females

 

numbers

 

female

 
variety
 
heterozygous
 

recessive

 
experiments

character

 

expected

 

family

 

distribution

 

Illustration

 

factor

 

dominant

 

approximately

 
recessives
 

dominants


results

 

colour

 

varieties

 

association

 
special
 

result

 
reverse
 

equality

 

crossed

 
consisted

resulting

 

mating

 

heterozygote

 

produced

 

eneral

 

production

 
explained
 

assumptions

 

leaving

 

readily


account

 

families

 

previous

 

contained

 
complex
 
collection
 

seemingly

 

justified

 
pattern
 

exists