FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108  
109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   >>  
n terms of definite physiological factors, and the diversity of animal and plant life is due to the gain or loss of these factors, to the origination of new ones, or to fresh combinations among those already in existence. Nor is there any valid reason against the supposition that even the most remarkable cases of resemblance, such as that of the leaf insect, may have arisen through a process of mutation. Experience with domestic plants and animals shows that the most bizarre forms may arise as sports and perpetuate themselves. Were such forms, arising under natural conditions, to be favoured by natural selection owing to a resemblance to something in their environment we should obtain a striking case of protective adaptation. And here it must not be forgotten that those striking cases to which our attention is generally called are but a very small minority of the existing forms of life. For that special group of adaptation phenomena classed under the head of Mimicry, Mendelism seems to offer an interpretation simpler than that at present in vogue. This perhaps may be more clearly expressed by taking a specific case. There is in Africa a genus of Danaine butterflies known as _Amauris_, and there are reasons for considering that the group to which it belongs possesses properties which render it unpalatable to vertebrate enemies such as birds or monkeys. In the same region is also found the genus _Euralia_ belonging to the entirely {145} different family of the Nymphalidae, to which there is no evidence for assigning the disagreeable properties of the Danaines. Now the different species of _Euralia_ show remarkably close resemblances to the species of _Amauris_, which are found flying in the same region, and it is supposed that by "mimicking" the unpalatable forms they impose upon their enemies and thereby acquire immunity from attack. The point at issue is the way in which this seemingly purposeful resemblance has been brought about. One of the species of _Euralia_ occurs in two very distinct forms (Pl. VI.), which were previously regarded as separate species under the names _E. wahlbergi_ and _E. mima_. These two forms respectively resemble _Amauris dominicanus_ and _A. echeria_. For purposes of argument we will assume _A. echeria_ to be the more recent form of the two. On the modern Darwinian view certain individuals of _A. dominicanus_ gradually diverged from the _dominicanus_ type and eventually reached the _echeria_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108  
109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   >>  



Top keywords:
species
 

echeria

 

dominicanus

 
Amauris
 
Euralia
 
resemblance
 

natural

 

adaptation

 

striking

 

properties


unpalatable
 
enemies
 

region

 

factors

 

render

 

reasons

 

resemblances

 

possesses

 

mimicking

 

vertebrate


belongs
 

flying

 

supposed

 
family
 

Nymphalidae

 
belonging
 
evidence
 

assigning

 

monkeys

 

Danaines


disagreeable

 

remarkably

 
argument
 
purposes
 

assume

 
recent
 

resemble

 

wahlbergi

 

diverged

 

eventually


reached

 

gradually

 
individuals
 

modern

 
Darwinian
 
separate
 

regarded

 

seemingly

 
attack
 

acquire