FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50  
51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   >>   >|  
a large. A head as big as the palm of your hand is not a very severe test of your powers; but in one as large as the _whole_ of your hand, say a head seven inches from crown to chin, the problem is increased quite immeasurably in difficulty. The real test is being able to produce in glass a real facsimile of a head by Botticelli or Holbein, and when you can do that satisfactorily you can do anything in glass-painting. Do not aim to get _too much_ in the first painting, at any rate not till you have had long practice. Be content if you get enough modelling on a head to turn the outline into a more sensitive and artistic drawing than it could be if planted down, raw and hard, upon the bare, cold glass. After all it is a common practice to fire the outline separately, and anything beyond this that you get upon the glass for first fire is so much to the good. But besides the quality of the _gum_ you will find sometimes differences in the quality or condition of the _pigment_. It may be insufficiently ground; in which case the matt, in passing over, will rasp away every vestige of the outline, so delicate a matter it is. You can tell when colour is not ground sufficiently by the way it acts when laid as a vertical wash. Lay a wash, moist enough to "run," on a bit of your easel-slab; it will run down, making a sort of seaweed-looking pattern--clear lanes of light on the glass with a black grain at the lower end. Those are the bits of unground material: under a 100-diameter microscope they look like chunks of ironstone or road metal, or of rusty iron, and you'll soon understand why they have scratched away your tender outline. You must grind such colour till it is smooth, and an old-fashioned _granite_ muller is the thing, not a glass one. Now, after all this, how am I to excuse the paradox that it is possible to have the colour ground _too_ fine! All one can say is that you "find it so." It can be so fine that it seems to slip about in a thin, oily kind of way. It's all as you find it; the differences of a craft are endless; there is no forecasting of everything, and you must buy your experience, like everybody else, and find what suits you, learning your skill and your materials side by side. Now these are the chief processes of painting, as far as laying on colour goes; but you still have much of your work before you, for the way in which light and shade is got on glass is almost more in "taking off" than i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50  
51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
colour
 
outline
 
painting
 
ground
 

quality

 

differences

 

practice

 

chunks

 

ironstone

 

microscope


smooth

 

understand

 

material

 

fashioned

 

unground

 

tender

 

scratched

 
diameter
 
materials
 

processes


learning

 

experience

 
laying
 

taking

 

excuse

 

paradox

 
muller
 

endless

 

forecasting

 
granite

satisfactorily

 
facsimile
 

Botticelli

 

Holbein

 
artistic
 

drawing

 

planted

 

sensitive

 

content

 

modelling


produce

 
powers
 
inches
 

severe

 

difficulty

 

immeasurably

 

problem

 

increased

 

vertical

 
sufficiently