else--something else!_ You always come back to
that. You are very vague, friend Friday; there is nothing practical in
your views.
The contest lasted a long time, and, as often happens, left each one
convinced that he was right. However, Robinson having great influence
over Friday, his views prevailed, and when the stranger came for an
answer, Robinson said to him:
"Stranger, in order that your proposition may be accepted, we must be
quite sure of two things:
"The first is, that your island is not richer in game than ours, for we
will struggle but with _equal arms_.
"The second is, that you will lose by the bargain. For, as in every
exchange there is necessarily a gainer and a loser, we would be cheated,
if you were not. What have you to say?".
"Nothing, nothing," replied the stranger, who burst out laughing, and
returned to his canoe.
--The story would not be bad if Robinson was not so foolish.
--He is no more so than the committee in Hauteville street.
--Oh, there is a great difference. You suppose one solitary man, or,
what comes to the same thing, two men living together. This is not our
world; the diversity of occupations, and the intervention of merchants
and money, change the question materially.
--All this complicates transactions, but does not change their nature.
--What! Do you propose to compare modern commerce to mere exchanges?
--Commerce is but a multitude of exchanges; the real nature of the
exchange is identical with the real nature of commerce, as small labor
is of the same nature with great, and as the gravitation which impels an
atom is of the same nature as that which attracts a world.
--Thus, according to you, these arguments, which in Robinson's mouth are
so false, are no less so in the mouths of our protectionists?
--Yes; only error is hidden better under the complication of
circumstances.
--Well, now, select some instance from what has actually occurred.
--Very well; in France, in view of custom and the exigencies of the
climate, cloth is an useful article. Is it the essential thing _to make
it, or to have it_?
--A pretty question! To have it, we must make it.
--That is not necessary. It is certain that to have it some one must
make it; but it is not necessary that the person or country using it
should make it. You did not produce that which clothes you so well, nor
France the coffee it uses for breakfast.
--But I purchased my cloth, and France its coffee.
|