FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188  
189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   >>   >|  
_The People._ Down with COMPETITION! _Jacques._ Despite all this man's declamation, he cannot make you _enjoy_ the sweets of restriction. _The People._ Down with RESTRICTION! _Pierre._ I declare to you that if the poor dealers in cattle and hogs are deprived of their livelihood, if they are sacrificed to theories, I will not be answerable for public order. Workmen, distrust this man. He is an agent of perfidious Normandy; he is under the pay of foreigners. He is a traitor, and must be hanged. [The people keep silent.] _Jacques._ Parisians, all that I say now, I said to you twenty years ago, when it occurred to Pierre to use the _octroi_ for his gain and your loss. I am not an agent of Normandy. Hang me if you will, but this will not prevent oppression from being oppression. Friends, you must kill neither Jacques nor Pierre, but liberty if it frightens you, or restriction if it hurts you. _The People._ Let us hang nobody, but let us emancipate everybody. XIV. SOMETHING ELSE. --What is restriction? --A partial prohibition. --What is prohibition? --An absolute restriction. --So that what is said of one is true of the other? --Yes, comparatively. They bear the same relation to each other that the arc of the circle does to the circle. --Then if prohibition is bad, restriction cannot be good. --No more than the arc can be straight if the circle is curved. --What is the common name for restriction and prohibition? --Protection. --What is the definite effect of protection? --To require from men _harder labor for the same result_. --Why are men so attached to the protective system? --Because, since liberty would accomplish the same result _with less labor_, this apparent diminution of labor frightens them. --Why do you say _apparent_? --Because all labor economized can be devoted to _something else_. --What? --That cannot and need not be determined. --Why? --Because, if the total of the comforts of France could be gained with a diminution of one-tenth on the total of its labor, no one could determine what comforts it would procure with the labor remaining at its disposal. One person would prefer to be better clothed, another better fed, another better taught, and another more amused. --Explain the workings and effect of protection. --It is not an easy matter. Before taking hold of a complicated instance, it must be studied in the simplest one. --Tak
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188  
189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

restriction

 

prohibition

 

Because

 

circle

 
Jacques
 
Pierre
 

People

 

result

 

comforts

 

apparent


diminution

 
liberty
 

frightens

 

oppression

 
effect
 

protection

 
Normandy
 
protective
 
attached
 

straight


system

 

common

 
curved
 

harder

 

definite

 
Protection
 

require

 

amused

 
Explain
 
workings

taught
 

person

 
prefer
 
clothed
 

matter

 

studied

 

simplest

 

instance

 
complicated
 

Before


taking

 
disposal
 

devoted

 

economized

 

determined

 

France

 

procure

 

remaining

 

determine

 

gained