vera causa_, but its remarkable uniformity,
as described by witnesses from different lands and ages, knowing nothing
of each other, makes us hesitate to accept a sweeping hypothesis of
hallucination. The case for it is not confirmed, when we have the same
reports from witnesses certainly not excited.
This extraordinary bundle, then, of reports, practically identical, of
facts paralysing to belief, this bundle made up of statements from so many
ages and countries, can only be 'filed for reference.' But it is manifest
that any savage who shared the experiences of Sir W. Crookes, Lord
Crawford, Mr. Hamilton Aide, M. Robert de St. Victor at Cideville, and
Policeman Higgs at Worksop, would believe that a spirit might tenant a
stick or stone--so believing he would be a Fetishist. Thus even of
Fetishism the probable origin is in a region of which we know nothing--the
_X_ region.
[Footnote 1: A sketch of the history will be found in the author's _Cock
Lane and Common Sense_.]
[Footnote 2: The best source is his article on 'Poltergeists.'
_Proceedings_ xi. 45-116. See, too, his 'Poltergeists' in _Studies in
Psychical Research_.]
[Footnote 3: _Studies in Psychical Research_, p. 140.]
[Footnote 4: See Preface to this edition for correction.]
[Footnote 5: _Proceedings_, S.P.R. vii. 383-394.]
[Footnote 6: See Sir W. Crookes's _Researches in Spiritualism_.]
[Footnote 7: Mr. Aide has given me this information. He recorded the
circumstances in his Diary at the time.]
[Footnote 8: _Report of Dialectical Society_, p. 209.]
[Footnote 9: See Porphyry, in Parthey's edition (Berlin, 1857), iii. 4.]
[Footnote 10: _Bulletin de la Societe de Biologie_, 1880, p. 399.]
[Footnote 11: Crookes, _Proceedings_, ix. 308.]
APPENDIX C
_CRYSTAL-GAZING_
Since the chapter on crystal-gazing was in type, a work by Dr. Pierre
Janet has appeared, styled 'Les Nevroses et les Idees Fixes.'[1] It
contains a chapter on crystal-gazing. The opinion of Dr. Janet, as that of
a savant familiar, at the Salpetriere, with 'neurotic' visionaries,
cannot but be interesting. Unluckily, the essay must be regarded as
seriously impaired in value by Dr. Janet's singular treatment of his
subject. Nothing is more necessary in these researches than accuracy of
statement. Now, Dr. Janet has taken a set of experiences, or experiments,
of Miss X.'s from that lady's interesting essay, already cited; has
attributed them, not to Miss X., but to vario
|