FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176  
177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   >>   >|  
the old ghost of Universal Power is regarded as dead, decrepit, or as a _roi-faineant_ not worth propitiating, for that is not true of the punisher of sin, the teacher of generosity, and the solitary sanction of faith between men and peoples. It would appear then, on the whole, that the question of the plain man to the anthropologist, 'Having got your idea of spirit into the savage's mind, how does he develop out of it what I call God?' has not been answered. God cannot be a reflection from human kings where there have been no kings; nor a president elected out of a polytheistic society of gods where there is as yet no polytheism; nor an ideal first ancestor where men do not worship their ancestors; while, again, the spirit of a man who died, real or ideal, does not answer to a common savage conception of the Creator. All this will become much more obvious as we study in detail the highest gods of the lowest races. Our study, of course, does not pretend to embrace the religion of all the savages in the world. We are content with typical, and, as a rule, well-observed examples. We range from the creeds of the most backward and worst-equipped nomad races, to those of peoples with an aristocracy, hereditary kings, houses and agriculture, ending with the Supreme Being of the highly civilised Incas, and with the Jehovah of the Hebrews. [Footnote 1: _Journal Anthrop. Inst._ xi. 874. We shall return to this passage.] [Footnote 2: Vol. i. p. 389, 1892.] [Footnote 3: Payne, i. 458.] [Footnote 4: _Prim. Cult._ vol. ii. p. 381; _Science and Hebrew Tradition_, pp. 346, 372.] [Footnote 5: _Prim. Cult_. vol. ii. p. 109.] [Footnote 6: Ibid. vol. ii. p. 110.] [Footnote 7: Ibid. vol. ii. p. 113.] [Footnote 8: _Prim. Cult_. vol. ii. pp. 115, 116, citing Callaway and others.] [Footnote 9: The Zulu religion will be analysed later.] [Footnote 10: _Prim. Cult_. vol. ii. pp. 130-144.] [Footnote 11: Ibid. vol. ii. p. 248.] [Footnote 12: And very few civilised populations, if any, are monotheistic in this sense.] [Footnote 13: _Prim. Cult_. vol. ii. pp. 332, 333.] [Footnote 14: _Prim. Cult_. vol. ii. pp. 335, 336.] [Footnote 15: _Myths of the New World_, 1868, p. 47.] [Footnote 16: I observed this point in _Myth, Ritual, and Religion_, while I did not see the implication, that the idea of 'spirit' was not necessarily present in the savage conception of the primal Beings, Creators, or Makers.] [Footn
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176  
177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

spirit

 

savage

 

observed

 
civilised
 
conception
 

peoples

 

religion

 

Science

 

Hebrew


ending

 
Jehovah
 

Tradition

 

return

 
passage
 

Anthrop

 
Journal
 
Supreme
 
highly
 

Hebrews


Ritual

 

Beings

 
primal
 

Creators

 

Makers

 
present
 

necessarily

 

Religion

 
implication
 
agriculture

analysed
 

Callaway

 
citing
 
populations
 

monotheistic

 

Having

 

anthropologist

 

question

 
reflection
 

answered


develop

 
decrepit
 

faineant

 

propitiating

 

regarded

 

Universal

 

sanction

 

solitary

 

punisher

 

teacher