FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   >>   >|  
published in October 1892. 'I sometimes think that orchids were designed at their inception to comfort the elect of human beings in this anxious age--the elect, I say, among whom the rich may or may not be included. Consider! To generate them must needs have been the latest "act of creation," as the ancient formula goes--in the realm of plants and flowers at least. The world was old already when orchids took place therein; for they could not have lived in those ages which preceded the modern order. Doubtless this family sprang from some earlier and simpler organisation, like all else. But the Duke of Argyll's famous argument against the "Origin of Man" applies here: that organisation could not have been an orchid. Its anatomy forbids fertilisation by wind, or even, one may say, by accident. Insects are necessary; in many cases insects of peculiar structure. Great was the diversion of the foolish--eminent savants may be very foolish indeed--when Darwin pronounced that if a certain moth, which he had never seen nor heard of, were to die out in Madagascar, the noblest of the Angraecums must cease to exist. To the present day no one has seen or heard of that moth, but the humour of the assertion is worn out. Only admiring wonder remains, for we know now that the induction is unassailable. Upon such chances does the life of an orchid depend. It follows that insects must have been well established before those plants came into being; and insects in their turn could not live until the earth had long "borne fruit after its kind." 'But from the beginning of things until this century, until this generation, one might almost say--civilised man could not enjoy the boon.... We may fancy the delight of the Greeks and the rivalry of millionaires at Rome had these flowers been known. "The Ancients" were by no means unskilful in horticulture--witness that astonishing report of the display at the coronation of Ptolemy Philadelphus, given by Athenaeus. But of course they could not have known how to begin growing orchids, even though they obtained them--I speak of epiphytes and foreign species, naturally. From the date of the Creation--which we need not fix--till the end of the Eighteenth Century, ships were not fast enough to convey them alive; a fact not deplorable since they would have been killed forthwith on landing. '... So I return to the argument. It has been seen that orchids are the latest and most finished work of the Creator
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
orchids
 

insects

 

organisation

 

orchid

 

foolish

 

flowers

 
argument
 
latest
 
plants
 

forthwith


killed

 

beginning

 

civilised

 
deplorable
 

things

 

century

 

generation

 

landing

 

depend

 

finished


chances

 

Creator

 

induction

 

unassailable

 
return
 

established

 

growing

 

Century

 
Eighteenth
 

Philadelphus


Athenaeus

 

obtained

 
species
 

naturally

 
Creation
 

foreign

 

epiphytes

 

Ptolemy

 
coronation
 

rivalry


convey
 
millionaires
 

Greeks

 

delight

 

astonishing

 

report

 
display
 

witness

 

horticulture

 

Ancients