FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252  
253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   >>   >|  
particular case; they had been for centuries the law of the land; and there was no denying the fact that the clergy had broken the law by recognising Wolsey as legate. Henry, of course, had (p. 285) licensed Wolsey to act as legate, and to punish the clergy for an offence, at which he had connived, was scarcely consistent with justice; but no King ever showed so clearly how the soundest constitutional maxims could be used to defeat the pleas of equity; it was frequently laid down during his reign that no licence from the King could be pleaded against penalties imposed by statute, and not a few parliamentary privileges were first asserted by Henry VIII.[789] So the clergy were cunningly caught in the meshes of the law. Chapuys declares that no one could understand the mysteries of _praemunire_; "its interpretation lies solely in the King's head, who amplifies it and declares it at his pleasure, making it apply to any case he pleases". He at least saw how _praemunire_ could be made to serve his purposes.[790] [Footnote 788: _Ibid._, iv., 6513.] [Footnote 789: _Cf. L. and P._, iv., 6199. Chapuys writes on 6th February, 1530, "I am told the King did not wish the Cardinal's case to be tried by Parliament, as, if it had been decided against him, the King could not have pardoned him".] [Footnote 790: _Ibid._, iv., 6488, 6699.] These, at the moment, were two. He wanted to extract from the clergy a recognition of his supremacy over the Church, and he wanted money. He was always in need of supplies, but especially now, in case war should arise from the Pope's refusal to grant his divorce; and Henry made it a matter of principle that the Church should pay for wars due to the Pope.[791] The penalty for _praemunire_ was forfeiture of goods and imprisonment, and the King probably thought he was unduly lenient in granting a pardon for a hundred thousand pounds, when he might (p. 286) have taken the whole of the clergy's goods and put them in gaol as well. The clergy objected strongly; in the old days of the Church's influence they would all have preferred to go to prison, and a unanimous refusal of the King's demands would even now have baulked his purpose. But the spirit was gone out of them. Chapuys instigated the papal nuncio to go down to Convocation and stiffen the backs of the clerg
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252  
253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

clergy

 

Footnote

 
praemunire
 

Chapuys

 
Church
 

declares

 

refusal

 
wanted
 

Wolsey

 

legate


matter

 

divorce

 

pardoned

 
principle
 

decided

 

Parliament

 
supplies
 

supremacy

 

recognition

 

moment


extract
 

pounds

 
demands
 
baulked
 

purpose

 
unanimous
 

prison

 

influence

 

preferred

 

spirit


Convocation

 

stiffen

 

nuncio

 
instigated
 

strongly

 

lenient

 

granting

 

pardon

 

hundred

 

unduly


thought

 

penalty

 
forfeiture
 

imprisonment

 

thousand

 

Cardinal

 

objected

 

maxims

 

defeat

 
constitutional