FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281  
282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   >>   >|  
[Footnote 906: This commission was not appointed till 1551: see the present writer's _Cranmer_, pp. 280-4.] [Footnote 907: 25 Henry VIII., c. 19. The first suggestion appears to have been "to give the Archbishop of Canterbury the seal of Chancery, and pass bulls, dispensations and other provisions under it" (_L. and P._, vii., 14; _cf._ vii., 57); his title was changed from _Apostolicae Sedis legatus_ to _Metropolitanus_ (_ibid._, vii., 1555).] Another act provided that charges of heresy must be supported by two lay witnesses, and that indictments for that offence could only be made by lay authorities. This, like the rest of Henry's anti-ecclesiastical legislation, was based on popular clamour. On the 5th of March the whole House of Commons, with the Speaker at their head, had waited on the King at York Place and expatiated for three hours on the oppressiveness of clerical jurisdiction. At length it was agreed that eight temporal peers, eight representatives of the Lower House and sixteen bishops "should discuss the matter and the King be umpire"[908]--a repetition of the plan of 1529 and a very exact reflection of Henry's methods and of the Church-and-State situation during the Reformation Parliament. [Footnote 908: _L. and P._, vii., 304, 393, 399; the provision about two witnesses was in 1547 extended to treason.] The final act of the session, which ended on 30th March, was a (p. 321) constitutional innovation of the utmost importance. From the earliest ages the succession to the crown had in theory been determined, first by election, and then by hereditary right. In practice it had often been decided by the barbarous arbitrament of war. For right is vague, it may be disputed, and there was endless variety of opinion as to the proper claimant to the throne if Henry should die. So vague right was to be replaced by definite law, which could not be disputed, but which, unlike right, could easily be changed. The succession was no longer to be regulated by an unalterable principle, but by the popular (or royal) will expressed in Acts of Parliament.[909] The first of a long series of Acts of Succession was now passed to vest the succession to the crown in the heirs o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281  
282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

succession

 
changed
 

popular

 

witnesses

 
disputed
 
Parliament
 
constitutional
 

importance

 

utmost


earliest
 

innovation

 

theory

 
treason
 
situation
 
Reformation
 
Church
 

methods

 

reflection

 
session

determined

 

provision

 

extended

 

barbarous

 

regulated

 
unalterable
 

principle

 

longer

 

definite

 

unlike


easily

 

passed

 
Succession
 

expressed

 

series

 

replaced

 

arbitrament

 
decided
 

hereditary

 

practice


claimant

 

throne

 

proper

 

endless

 

variety

 
opinion
 
election
 

oppressiveness

 

provisions

 

dispensations