FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226  
227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   >>   >|  
pp. 71, 72.] [Footnote 713: _Narratives of the Reformation_, Camden Soc., pp. 295, 296.] [Footnote 714: _Cf._ Duchess of Norfolk's letter to John Paston, 8th June, 1455 (_Paston Letters_, ed. 1900, i., 337), and in 1586 Sir Henry Bagnal asked the Earl of Rutland if he had a seat to spare in Parliament as Bagnal was anxious "for his learning's sake to be made a Parliament man" (_D.N.B._, Suppl., i., 96).] [Footnote 715: _L. and P._, xiv., 645; _cf._ Hallam, 1884, iii., 44-45.] [Footnote 716: Foxe, ed. Townsend, vi., 54. There are some illustrations and general remarks on Henry's relations with Parliament in Porritt's _Unreformed House of Commons_, 2 vols., 1903.] [Footnote 717: At Reigate, says the Duke, "I doubt whether any burgesses be there or not" (_L. and P._, x., 816); and apparently there were none at Gatton.] But these nominations were not royal, and there is no reason (p. 254) to suppose that the nominees were any more likely to be subservient to the Crown than freely elected members unless the local magnate happened to be a royal minister. Their views depended on those of their patrons, who might be opposed to the Court; and, in 1539, Cromwell's agents were considering the advisability of setting up Crown candidates against those of Gardiner, Bishop of Winchester.[718] The curious letter to Cromwell in 1529,[719] upon which is based the theory that the House of Commons consisted of royal nominees, is singularly inconclusive. Cromwell sought Henry's permission to serve in Parliament for two reasons; firstly, he was still a servant of the obnoxious and fallen Cardinal; secondly, he was seeking to transfer himself to Henry's service, and thought he might be useful to the King in the House of Commons. If Henry accepted his offer, Cromwell was to be nominated for Oxford; if he were not elected there, he was to be put up for one of the boroughs in the diocese of Winchester, then vacant through Wolsey's resignation. Even with the King's assent, his election at Oxford was not regarded as certain; and, as a matter of fact, Cromwell sat neither fo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226  
227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Cromwell

 

Footnote

 
Parliament
 

Commons

 
Bagnal
 

Winchester

 

letter

 
nominees
 

elected

 

Paston


Oxford

 

freely

 

setting

 
curious
 

candidates

 

Gardiner

 
advisability
 

subservient

 

Bishop

 

minister


patrons
 

happened

 
magnate
 
depended
 

members

 
agents
 

opposed

 

reasons

 

diocese

 

boroughs


vacant

 

accepted

 

nominated

 
Wolsey
 

resignation

 

matter

 

assent

 

election

 

regarded

 

thought


sought

 

inconclusive

 
permission
 

singularly

 

consisted

 

theory

 

firstly

 

seeking

 

transfer

 
service