FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212  
213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   >>   >|  
l; they be so maliciously set _in favorem haereticae pravitatis_".[668] The heresy was no matter of belief, but hatred of clerical immunities. The _Epistolae Obscurorum Virorum_, wrote More to Erasmus in 1516, was "popular everywhere";[669] and no more bitter a satire had yet been penned on the clergy. In this matter Henry and his lay subjects were at one. Standish, whom Taylor describes as the promoter and instigator of all these evils, was a favourite preacher at Henry's Court. The King, said Pace, had "often praised his doctrine".[670] But what was it? It was no advocacy of Henry's loved "new learning," for Standish denounced the Greek Testament of Erasmus, and is held up to ridicule by the great Dutch humanist;[671] Standish, too, was afterwards a stout defender of the Pope's dispensing power, and followed Fisher in his protest against the divorce before the legatine Court. The doctrine, which pleased the King so much, was Standish's denial of clerical immunity from State control, and his assertion of royal prerogatives over the Church. (p. 237) In 1518 the Bishopric of St. Asaph's fell vacant. Wolsey, who was then at the height of his power, recommended Bolton,[672] prior of St. Bartholomew's, a learned man; but Henry was resolved to reward his favourite divine, and Standish obtained the see. Pace, a good churchman, expressed himself to Wolsey as "mortified" at the result, but said it was inevitable, as besides the King's good graces, Standish enjoyed "the favour of all the courtiers for the singular assistance he has rendered towards subverting the Church of England".[673] [Footnote 667: See Dr. Gairdner, _History of English Church in Sixteenth Century_, ch. iii., where the story of Richard Hunne is critically examined in detail. Its importance consists, however, not in the question whether Hunne was or was not murdered by the Bishop's chancellor Horsey, but in the popular hostility to the clergy revealed by the incident.] [Footnote 668: _L. and P._, ii., 2.] [Footnote 669: _Ibid._, ii., 2492.] [Footnote 670: _Ibid._, ii., 4074.] [Footnote 671: _Ibid._, iii., 929.] [Footnote 672: _L. and P._, ii., 4082.] [Footnote 673: _Ibid._, ii., 4074.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212  
213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Standish

 

Church

 

favourite

 

clergy

 

Wolsey

 
doctrine
 
clerical
 

Erasmus

 

popular


matter

 

churchman

 

obtained

 

reward

 

divine

 

expressed

 

mortified

 

graces

 

critically

 
inevitable

importance

 

resolved

 

result

 

vacant

 

detail

 

Bishopric

 

Bartholomew

 

learned

 
Bolton
 

height


recommended

 

enjoyed

 

courtiers

 

Gairdner

 

Bishop

 
murdered
 

History

 

question

 

Century

 

Richard


English

 
Sixteenth
 

chancellor

 

examined

 

rendered

 

assistance

 
singular
 

subverting

 

hostility

 
Horsey