FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199  
200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   >>   >|  
there was no need of either dispensation or brief. This assertion seems to have shaken Henry; certainly he began to shift his position, and, early in 1529, he was wishing for some noted divine, friar or other, who would maintain that the Pope could not dispense at all.[616] This was his first doubt as to the plenitude of papal power; his marriage with Catherine must be invalid, because his conscience told him so; if it was not invalid through defects in the dispensation, it must be invalid because the Pope could not dispense. Wolsey met the objection with a legal point, perfectly good in itself, but trivial. There were two canonical disabilities which the dispensation must meet for Henry's marriage to be valid; first, the consummation of Catherine's marriage with Arthur; secondly, the marriage, even though it was not consummated, was yet celebrated _in facie ecclesiae_, and generally reputed complete. There was thus an _impedimentum publicae honestatis_ to the marriage of Henry and Catherine, and this impediment was not mentioned in, and therefore not removed by, the dispensation.[617] [Footnote 614: _Ibid._, iv., 5376-77, 5470-71, 5486-87. For the arguments as to its validity see Busch, _England under the Tudors_, Eng. trs., i., 376-8; Friedmann, _Anne Boleyn_, ii., 329; and Lord Acton in the _Quarterly Rev._, cxliii., 1-51.] [Footnote 615: She made this statement to Campeggio in the confessional (_L. and P._, iv., 4875).] [Footnote 616: _Ibid._, iv., 5377, 5438; _Sp. Cal._, iii., 276, 327.] [Footnote 617: _L. and P._, iv., 3217. See this point discussed in Taunton's _Cardinal Wolsey_, chap. x.] But all this legal argument might be invalidated by the brief. (p. 220) It was useless to proceed with the trial until the promoters of the suit knew what the brief contained. According to Mendoza, Catherine's "whole right" depended upon the brief, a statement indicating a general suspicion that the bull was really insufficient.[618] So the winter of 1528-29 and the following spring were spent in efforts to get hold of the original brief, or to induce Clement to declare it a forgery. The Queen was made to write to Charles that it was absolutely essential to her case that the brief should b
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199  
200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

marriage

 

Catherine

 

dispensation

 

Footnote

 

invalid

 

statement

 
Wolsey
 
dispense
 

discussed

 

Taunton


Cardinal

 

useless

 

proceed

 

invalidated

 

argument

 

Quarterly

 

cxliii

 

Boleyn

 

confessional

 
Campeggio

original

 

induce

 

Clement

 

declare

 

spring

 

efforts

 

forgery

 

essential

 
absolutely
 

Charles


According

 

Mendoza

 

contained

 

promoters

 

depended

 
insufficient
 

winter

 

indicating

 

general

 

suspicion


trivial

 
perfectly
 

objection

 

position

 

canonical

 

consummation

 
Arthur
 

disabilities

 

plenitude

 
maintain