FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233  
234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   >>   >|  
ation ... over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other _needful buildings_." Among these "_needful buildings_" light-houses must in fact have been included. The bare statement of these facts is sufficient to prove that no analogy exists between the power to erect a light-house as a "needful building" and that to deepen the channel of a river. In what I have said I do not mean to intimate a doubt of the power of Congress to construct such internal improvements as may be essentially necessary for defense and protection against the invasion of a foreign enemy. The power to declare war and, the obligation to protect each State against invasion clearly cover such cases. It will scarcely be claimed, however, that the improvement of the St. Clair River is within this category. This river is the boundary line between the United States and the British Province of Upper Canada. Any improvement of its navigation, therefore, which we could make for purposes of war would equally inure to the benefit of Great Britain, the only enemy which could possibly confront us in that quarter. War would be a sad calamity for both nations, but should it ever, unhappily, exist, the battles will not be fought on the St. Clair River or on the lakes with which it communicates. JAMES BUCHANAN. WASHINGTON, _February 6, 1860_. _To the Senate of the United States_: On the last day of the last session of Congress a resolution, which had passed both Houses, "in relation to removal of obstructions to navigation in the mouth of the Mississippi River" was presented to me for approval. I have retained this resolution because it was presented to me at a period when it was impossible to give the subject that examination to which it appeared to be entitled. I need not repeat the views on this point presented in the introductory portion of my message to the Senate of the 2d [1st] instant. In addition I would merely observe that although at different periods sums, amounting in the aggregate to $690,000, have been appropriated by Congress for the purpose of removing the bar and obstructions at the mouth of the Mississippi, yet it is now acknowledged that this money has been expended with but little, if any, practical benefit to its navigation. JAMES BUCHANAN. WASHINGTON, _April 17, 1860_. _To the Senate of the U
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233  
234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

needful

 

Congress

 
Senate
 

navigation

 
presented
 

States

 

United

 
resolution
 

Mississippi

 

invasion


improvement

 

obstructions

 

buildings

 
benefit
 

WASHINGTON

 

BUCHANAN

 
battles
 

fought

 

unhappily

 

removal


Houses
 

February

 
session
 
passed
 

relation

 
communicates
 

appropriated

 

purpose

 

removing

 

aggregate


periods

 

amounting

 

practical

 
acknowledged
 

expended

 

observe

 

examination

 

subject

 

appeared

 

entitled


impossible

 

retained

 
period
 

repeat

 

instant

 

addition

 

message

 

introductory

 

portion

 
approval