FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   >>  
ys were in the _fleeting_, and thus _crying_ 'for the Lord's sake' out at an iron window.' NOTE XX. IV. 3. 83. In order to avoid the unmetrical line 83, as given in the Folios and by all Editors to Johnson inclusive, the lines 82-85 have been arranged as five, thus: _If ... Let ... In secret ... Ere ... To the under_ ... Capell. _If ... Let ... Both ... The sun ... The under_ ... Steevens. _If ... Let ... Both ... Ere ... To yonder_ ... Collier. _If ... Let ... Both ... The sun ... To yond_ ... Singer. Perhaps the best arrangement, because requiring the least change from the printing of the Folio, would be to put the words 'And Claudio' in a line by themselves. Many examples of such a broken line in the middle of a speech may be found (e.g. V. 1. 448), and it would add to the emphasis with which the Duke commends Claudio to the Provost's care. The long line V. 1. 465, might be similarly reduced by reading 'His name Is Barnardine.' NOTE XXI. IV. 5. 1. Mr Spedding suggests that Act V. should begin here. Dr Johnson says: "This play has two Friars, either of whom might singly have served. I should therefore imagine that 'Friar Thomas,' in the first Act, might be changed without any harm to 'Friar Peter:' for why should the Duke unnecessarily trust two in an affair which required only one? The name of Friar Thomas is never mentioned in the dialogue, and therefore seems arbitrarily placed at the head of the scene." NOTE XXII. V. 1. 131. Mr Sidney Walker, in his _Shakespeare's Versification_, pp. 80 sqq. suggests that in this and other passages we should read '_this_,' because '_This is_ is not unfrequently, like _That is_, &c. contracted into a monosyllable.' For the reason assigned in Note (III) to _The Tempest_, I. 2. 173, we have preferred the more familiar spelling _this's_. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Sources: The editors' Preface (e-text 23041) discusses the 17th- and 18th-century editions in detail; the newer (19th-century) editions are simply listed by name. The following editions may appear in the Notes. All inset text is quoted from the Preface. Folios: F1 1623; F2 (no date given); F3 1663; F4 1685. "The five plays contained in this volume occur in the first Folio in the same order, and ... were there printed for the f
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   >>  



Top keywords:

editions

 

Preface

 

century

 
suggests
 
Claudio
 

Johnson

 

Folios

 

Thomas

 
fleeting
 

monosyllable


contracted
 

unfrequently

 

arbitrarily

 

Shakespeare

 

reason

 

Versification

 

Walker

 

Sidney

 
dialogue
 

passages


mentioned

 

editors

 

quoted

 

printed

 

volume

 

contained

 

listed

 

familiar

 

spelling

 

Sources


preferred

 

Tempest

 
simply
 

detail

 

discusses

 

assigned

 

printing

 
change
 
arrangement
 

requiring


speech

 
middle
 

examples

 

broken

 
Perhaps
 
arranged
 

inclusive

 

unmetrical

 

Editors

 

secret