d of the table, "you have just come back
to us from Australia; of course, everything is perfect there. What do
you think--are the particles in a ciborium, left by inadvertence,
outside the corporal during consecration consecrated? Now, just reflect
for a moment, for it is an important matter."
"Unquestionably they are," said the young priest confidently.
"They are _not_," replied the chairman. "The whole consensus of
theologians is against you."
"For example?" said Father Irwin coolly.
"Wha-at?" said the chairman, taken quite aback.
"I doubt if all theologians are on your side," said Father Irwin. "Would
you be pleased to name a few?"
"Certainly," said the chairman, with a pitying smile at this young man's
presumption. "What do you think of Benedict XIV., Suarez, and St.
Alphonsus?"
The young man didn't seem to be much crushed under the avalanche.
"They held that there should be reconsecration?"
"Certainly."
"Let me see. Do I understand you aright? The celebrant intends from the
beginning to consecrate those particles?"
"Yes."
"The intention perseveres to the moment of consecration?"
"Yes!"
"And, the _materia_ being quite right, he intends to consecrate that
objective, that just lies inadvertently outside the corporal?"
"Quite so."
"And you say that Benedict XIV., Suarez, and St. Alphonsus maintain the
necessity of reconsecration?"
"Yes."
"Then I pity Benedict XIV., Suarez, and St. Alphonsus."
There was consternation. The bishop looked grave. The old men gaped in
surprise and horror. The young men held down their heads and smiled.
"I consider that a highly improper remark, as applied to the very
leading lights of theological science," said the chairman, with a frown.
And when the chairman frowned it was not pleasant. The bishop's face,
too, was growing tight and stern.
"Perhaps I should modify it," said the young priest airily. "Perhaps I
should have rather said that modern theologians and right reason are
dead against such an opinion."
"Quote one modern theologian that is opposed to the common and universal
teaching of theologians on the matter!"
"Well, Ballerini, for example, and the Salmanticenses--"
"Psha! Ballerini. Ballerini is to upset everything, I suppose?"
"Ballerini has the Missal and common sense on his side."
"The Missal?"
"Yes. Read this--or shall I read it?
"'Quidquid horum deficit, scilicet materia debita, forma cum
intentione, e
|