FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129  
130   131   132   >>  
ave been later found to be exact. And besides, the incidents of a transcendental and consequently unverifiable nature might have been omitted from these tables. But in this case again it has been thought better to give the false and doubtful facts full play. The reader must draw from these results whatever conclusion seems to him the most correct. FOOTNOTES: [80] _See_ Professor Hyslop's Report, _Proc. of S.P.R._, vol. xvi. p. 90, etc., for "Carruthers." [81] Name of one of Professor Hyslop's brothers. [82] _Proc. of S.P.R._, vol. xvi. p. 115. [83] _Proc. of S.P.R._, vol. xvi. p. 121. CHAPTER XVI Examination of the telepathic hypothesis--Some arguments which render its acceptance difficult. I have mentioned in passing what should be understood by the word _telepathy_. I shall repeat my explanation; it is necessary that the reader should have it well in mind, as in this chapter I am about to examine the telepathic hypothesis and endeavour to find out if it will cover the facts which we are studying. By telepathy is here meant, not only the power of obtaining information from the consciousness and subconsciousness of the sitters on the part of the secondary personalities of Mrs Piper, but also their power to read the consciousness and subconsciousness of persons somewhere or anywhere else on earth, no matter where, distance in no way increasing the difficulty of this reading. This is evidently among hypotheses a wide and far-reaching one, and yet, if we reject the spiritualistic hypothesis, there is no other which will cover all the facts. The following arguments here briefly indicated are, with others, developed at length in Professor Hyslop's book. I shall not again go over those which circumstances have necessitated my explaining with sufficient clearness before in the course of this work. To begin with, what is the origin of this telepathic hypothesis? Is it justified by the facts of experimental or spontaneous observation among psychologists? Certainly not; if we only reckoned the experiments and observations of official psychology, the hypothesis of telepathy, as we understand it, would be almost unfounded. This hypothesis is in reality founded on our ignorance; we may admit it temporarily, because we are ignorant of the latent powers of the human mind, and because we have every reason to think these latent powers great and numerous. I think that the first wide use of it was made in th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129  
130   131   132   >>  



Top keywords:

hypothesis

 

Hyslop

 

Professor

 

telepathic

 

telepathy

 

arguments

 

consciousness

 

subconsciousness

 
powers
 

latent


reader
 

briefly

 

distance

 
matter
 

evidently

 
reaching
 
hypotheses
 

reject

 

reading

 

increasing


spiritualistic

 

difficulty

 
founded
 

reality

 
ignorance
 

unfounded

 

official

 

observations

 
psychology
 

understand


temporarily

 

numerous

 

ignorant

 

reason

 

experiments

 

reckoned

 

necessitated

 

circumstances

 
explaining
 
sufficient

clearness

 

length

 

spontaneous

 

experimental

 

observation

 

psychologists

 

Certainly

 

justified

 

origin

 

developed