FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129  
130   131   132   >>  
ave been later found to be exact. And besides, the incidents of a transcendental and consequently unverifiable nature might have been omitted from these tables. But in this case again it has been thought better to give the false and doubtful facts full play. The reader must draw from these results whatever conclusion seems to him the most correct. FOOTNOTES: [80] _See_ Professor Hyslop's Report, _Proc. of S.P.R._, vol. xvi. p. 90, etc., for "Carruthers." [81] Name of one of Professor Hyslop's brothers. [82] _Proc. of S.P.R._, vol. xvi. p. 115. [83] _Proc. of S.P.R._, vol. xvi. p. 121. CHAPTER XVI Examination of the telepathic hypothesis--Some arguments which render its acceptance difficult. I have mentioned in passing what should be understood by the word _telepathy_. I shall repeat my explanation; it is necessary that the reader should have it well in mind, as in this chapter I am about to examine the telepathic hypothesis and endeavour to find out if it will cover the facts which we are studying. By telepathy is here meant, not only the power of obtaining information from the consciousness and subconsciousness of the sitters on the part of the secondary personalities of Mrs Piper, but also their power to read the consciousness and subconsciousness of persons somewhere or anywhere else on earth, no matter where, distance in no way increasing the difficulty of this reading. This is evidently among hypotheses a wide and far-reaching one, and yet, if we reject the spiritualistic hypothesis, there is no other which will cover all the facts. The following arguments here briefly indicated are, with others, developed at length in Professor Hyslop's book. I shall not again go over those which circumstances have necessitated my explaining with sufficient clearness before in the course of this work. To begin with, what is the origin of this telepathic hypothesis? Is it justified by the facts of experimental or spontaneous observation among psychologists? Certainly not; if we only reckoned the experiments and observations of official psychology, the hypothesis of telepathy, as we understand it, would be almost unfounded. This hypothesis is in reality founded on our ignorance; we may admit it temporarily, because we are ignorant of the latent powers of the human mind, and because we have every reason to think these latent powers great and numerous. I think that the first wide use of it was made in th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129  
130   131   132   >>  



Top keywords:
hypothesis
 

Hyslop

 

Professor

 
telepathic
 
telepathy
 
arguments
 

consciousness

 

subconsciousness

 

powers

 

latent


reader
 
briefly
 

distance

 

matter

 

evidently

 

reaching

 

hypotheses

 

reject

 

reading

 

increasing


spiritualistic
 

difficulty

 

founded

 
reality
 

ignorance

 
unfounded
 
official
 

observations

 

psychology

 

understand


temporarily

 

numerous

 
ignorant
 
reason
 

experiments

 
reckoned
 

necessitated

 

circumstances

 

explaining

 

sufficient


clearness

 

length

 
spontaneous
 

experimental

 
observation
 
psychologists
 

Certainly

 

justified

 
origin
 

developed