FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970  
971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   >>   >|  
ut I will ask attention to the report of the trial of Dorr for treason, which took place in 1844, before all the judges of the Supreme Court of the State. He was indicted in August, 1842, and the trial came on in March, 1844. The indictment was found while the charter government was in force, and the trial was had under the new constitution. He was found guilty of treason. And I turn to the report of the trial now, to call attention to the language of the court in its charge, as delivered by Chief Justice Durfee. I present the following extract from that charge:-- "It may be, Gentlemen, that he really believed himself to be the governor of the State, and that he acted throughout under this delusion. However this may go to extenuate the offence, it does not take from it its legal guilt. It is no defence to an indictment for the violation of any law for the defendant to come into court and say, 'I thought that I was but exercising a constitutional right, and I claim an acquittal on the ground of mistake,' Were it so, there would be an end to all law and all government. Courts and juries would have nothing to do but to sit in judgment upon indictments, in order to acquit or excuse. The accused has only to prove that he has been systematic in committing crime, and that he thought that he had a right to commit it; and, according to this doctrine, you must acquit. The main ground upon which the prisoner sought for a justification was, that a constitution had been adopted by a majority of the male adult population of this State, voting in their primary or natural capacity or condition, and that he was subsequently elected, and did the acts charged, as governor under it. He offered the votes themselves to prove its adoption, which were also to be followed by proof of his election. This evidence we have ruled out. Courts and juries, Gentlemen, do not count votes to determine whether a constitution has been adopted or a governor elected, or not. Courts take notice, without proof offered from the bar, what the constitution is or was, and who is or was the governor of their own State. It belongs to the legislature to exercise this high duty. It is the legislature which, in the exercise of its delegated sovereignty, counts the votes and declares whether a constitution be adopted or a governor
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957   958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970  
971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

governor

 

constitution

 
Courts
 

adopted

 

thought

 

Gentlemen

 

offered

 
charge
 

exercise

 

legislature


treason

 

acquit

 

attention

 

report

 
government
 

ground

 

elected

 

indictment

 

juries

 

majority


justification

 

systematic

 
committing
 
accused
 
excuse
 

commit

 
prisoner
 

doctrine

 
sought
 
notice

determine
 

sovereignty

 
counts
 
declares
 

delegated

 

belongs

 
evidence
 
condition
 

subsequently

 
capacity

natural

 

voting

 

primary

 

charged

 

election

 

adoption

 
population
 

defendant

 
guilty
 

language