FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391  
392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   >>   >|  
med Utah to be a State, with a constitution which does not discriminate against women. With Utah and Wyoming we have two States coming into the Union with the principle of equal rights to women guaranteed by their constitutions. On November 3 the men of Idaho declared in favor of woman suffrage, and for the first time in the history of judicial decisions upon the enlargement of women's rights, civil and political, a Supreme Court gave a broad interpretation of the constitution. The Supreme Court of Idaho--Isaac N. Sullivan, Joseph W. Huston, John T. Morgan--unanimously decided that the amendment was carried constitutionally. This decision is the more remarkable because the Court might as easily have declared that the constitution requires amendments to receive a majority of the total vote cast at the election, instead of a majority of the votes cast on the amendment itself. By the former construction it would have been lost, notwithstanding two to one of all who expressed an opinion were in favor. If anyone will study the history of our woman suffrage movement since the days of reconstruction and the adoption of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Federal Constitution--taking the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in the cases of Mrs. Myra Bradwell for the protection of her civil rights; of Mrs. Virginia L. Minor for the protection of her political rights; of the law granting Municipal Suffrage to women in Michigan; on giving women the right to vote for County School Commissioners in New York, and various other decisions--he will find that in every case the courts have put the narrowest possible construction upon the spirit and the letter of the constitution. The Judges of Idaho did themselves the honor to make a decision in direct opposition to judicial precedent and prejudice. The Idaho victory is a great credit not only to the majority of men who voted for the amendment, but to the three Judges who made this broad and just decision. After sketching the situation in California, and relating the part taken by the National Association in these two campaigns, she concluded: In every county which was properly organized, with a committee in every precinct, who visited every voter and distributed leaflets in e
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391  
392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

rights

 

constitution

 
decisions
 

Supreme

 

decision

 

majority

 
amendment
 
judicial
 

history

 

Judges


suffrage
 
construction
 
political
 

protection

 

States

 

declared

 
Bradwell
 

courts

 

spirit

 

taking


United

 

narrowest

 

Municipal

 

granting

 

School

 

Suffrage

 

County

 

giving

 

Michigan

 

Commissioners


letter

 

Virginia

 

Constitution

 

campaigns

 

concluded

 
Association
 
National
 

relating

 

county

 

distributed


leaflets
 
visited
 

precinct

 

properly

 

organized

 

committee

 
California
 

situation

 
precedent
 

prejudice