FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380  
381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   >>   >|  
e debate was long and animated, but although there was intense feeling it was conducted in perfectly temperate and respectful language. Those participating were Rachel Foster Avery, Katie R. Addison, Henry B. Blackwell, Alice Stone Blackwell, Carrie Chapman Catt, Annie L. Diggs, Laura M. Johns, Helen Morris Lewis, Anna Howard Shaw, Frances A. Williamson and Elizabeth U. Yates speaking for the resolution; Lillie Devereux Blake, Clara B. Colby, Cornelia H. Cary, Lavina A. Hatch, Harriette A. Keyser, J. B. Merwin, Caroline Hallowell Miller, Althea B. Stryker, Charlotte Perkins Stetson, Mary Bentley Thomas and Victoria C. Whitney speaking against it. Miss Anthony was thoroughly aroused and, leaving the chair, spoke against the resolution as follows: The one distinct feature of our association has been the right of individual opinion for every member. We have been beset at each step with the cry that somebody was injuring the cause by the expression of sentiments which differed from those held by the majority. The religious persecution of the ages has been carried on under what was claimed to be the command of God. I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do, because I notice it always coincides with their own desires. All the way along the history of our movement there has been this same contest on account of religious theories. Forty years ago one of our noblest men said to me: "You would better never hold another convention than allow Ernestine L. Rose on your platform;" because that eloquent woman, who ever stood for justice and freedom, did not believe in the plenary inspiration of the Bible. Did we banish Mrs. Rose? No, indeed! Every new generation of converts threshes over the same old straw. The point is whether you will sit in judgment on one who questions the divine inspiration of certain passages in the Bible derogatory to women. If Mrs. Stanton had written approvingly of these passages you would not have brought in this resolution for fear the cause might be injured among the _liberals_ in religion. In other words, if she had written _your_ views, you would not have considered a resolution necessary. To pass this one is to set back the hands on the dial of reform. What you should say to outsiders is that a Christian has neither more nor less rights in our
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380  
381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

resolution

 

passages

 
written
 

inspiration

 

speaking

 

religious

 
Blackwell
 
Ernestine
 

notice

 

coincides


eloquent
 
history
 
movement
 

platform

 

desires

 

noblest

 
contest
 

justice

 

theories

 

account


convention

 

considered

 

injured

 

liberals

 

religion

 

Christian

 

rights

 

outsiders

 

reform

 

brought


generation

 

converts

 

threshes

 

plenary

 

banish

 
derogatory
 
Stanton
 

approvingly

 

divine

 

questions


judgment
 
freedom
 

Howard

 

Frances

 

Elizabeth

 

Williamson

 
Morris
 

Lavina

 
Harriette
 

Keyser