FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690  
691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   >>   >|  
s. It is wholesome doctrine, in the opinion of _The Star_, to deny woman's rights and negro's rights and the right of free discussion, to maintain them is to countenance "corrupt and unwholesome doctrines." The subject of woman's rights somehow is attracting general attention. Rev. Mr. Sunderland, of this city, in a published sermon, sought to bring the whole matter into contempt under cover of the ridicule of the Bloomer dress. His position is, that if God made man a little lower than the angels, He made woman a little lower still. His sermon we gave last week. This week we give a woman's reply to it. Nobly has she shown him up. We like her review. She treats his argument gravely, and answers it logically. She has touched the tender in him. He will begin to think women are somebody after all. We think he should have measured his _calibre_ before making such a tilt.... Regarding his condition as rather awkward, and finding it difficult to be quiet, he appears in the Friday _Star_ with the following equivocal communication: _The Woman's Rights Question._--Mr. Editor: The last two numbers of _The Star_ contain an article purporting to review my Sermon from Deut. xxii. 5, but the author does not appear. The article in question contains inaccuracies which should be noticed for the author's future benefit. If the author should turn out to be a man, I should have no objection to point out those inaccuracies through your columns. But if the writer is a lady, why, I really don't know yet what I shall do. If I thought she would consent to a personal interview, I should like to see her. Very truly, B. SUNDERLAND. _Syracuse, Nov. 18_. Some other person, under the head of "A Reader," addressed the following to _The Star_, which, in the editor's absence, was published: How is this, Mr. Editor? A few days since I read in your papers a sermon, on woman's rights by Rev. Byron Sunderland. In your numbers of Wednesday and Thursday I found an able and respectful Review of that discourse--a Review which, in some points, is unanswerable, especially in the matter of Scripture and female dress. The dominie appealed to Scripture, and the reviewer "has him fast." I have hear
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690  
691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
rights
 

sermon

 

author

 

numbers

 

Scripture

 

review

 
published
 

article

 

Sunderland

 

Editor


matter
 

inaccuracies

 

Review

 
future
 
benefit
 
thought
 

noticed

 
columns
 

objection

 

writer


question

 

person

 

Wednesday

 

Thursday

 

papers

 
respectful
 

discourse

 
appealed
 

reviewer

 

dominie


female

 

points

 

unanswerable

 

SUNDERLAND

 
Syracuse
 

personal

 
interview
 

absence

 

editor

 

addressed


Reader

 

consent

 

awkward

 
ridicule
 

Bloomer

 
position
 
contempt
 

angels

 
treats
 
sought