FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718  
719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   >>   >|  
nd while any such statutes remain on the books, no good man will cease to exert himself for their removal. I ask the right to vote, not because it would create antagonism, but because it would create harmony. I want to do away with antagonism by removing oppression, for where oppression exists, there antagonism must exist also. ERNESTINE L. ROSE: In allusion to the law respecting wills, I wish to say that, according to the Revised Statutes of our State, a married woman has not a right to make a will. The law says that wills may be made by all persons, except idiots, persons of unsound mind, married women, and infants. Mark well, all but idiots, lunatics, married women, and infants. Male infants ought to consider it quite an insult to be placed in the same category with married women. No, a married woman has no right to bequeath a dollar of the property, no matter how much she may have brought into the marriage, or accumulated in it. Not a dollar to a friend, a relative, or even to her own child, to keep him from starving. And this is the law in the nineteenth century, in the enlightened United States, under a Republic that declares all men to be free and equal. LUCY STONE: Just one word. I think Mrs. Rose is a little mistaken; I wish to correct her by saying that of some States in-- Mrs. ROSE: I did not say this was the universal law; I said it was the law in the State of New York. LUCY STONE: I was not paying close attention, and must have been mistaken. In Massachusetts the law makes a married woman's will valid in two cases: the first is, where the consent of her husband is written on the will; the second, where she wills all she has to her husband, in which case his written consent is not deemed requisite. Dr. HARRIOT K. HUNT spoke on the fruitful theme of taxation without representation! and read her annual protest[120] to the authorities of Boston against being compelled to submit to that injustice. She said: I wish to vote, that women may have, by law, an equal right with men in property. In October, 1851, I went to pay my taxes in Boston. Going into the Assessor's office, I saw a tall, thin, weak, stupid-looking Irish boy. It was near election time, and I looked at him scrutinizingly. He held in his hand a do
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718  
719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
married
 

antagonism

 

infants

 

persons

 

idiots

 

States

 
mistaken
 

property

 

dollar

 

written


consent
 

husband

 

Boston

 
oppression
 
create
 
Massachusetts
 

stupid

 
attention
 

scrutinizingly

 

correct


looked

 

paying

 

universal

 

election

 

authorities

 
annual
 

protest

 
compelled
 

injustice

 

October


Assessor

 

HARRIOT

 

requisite

 

deemed

 
submit
 

taxation

 
representation
 

fruitful

 

office

 

friend


allusion

 

respecting

 

Revised

 
ERNESTINE
 

Statutes

 
unsound
 
exists
 

removing

 
remain
 
statutes