FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733  
734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   >>   >|  
we consider this proposition more than liberal--it was chivalric and generous. We listened with interest to some of the arguments _pro_ and _con_, and propose here to recapitulate their substance, that our readers may see at a glance the present position and bearing of the controversy. We will begin with the first speech we heard, that of Rev. WM. H. CHANNING: They say the public platform is not in woman's sphere; but let us understand why. Jenny Lind stands on that platform before thousands of men and women, and sings, "I know that my Redeemer liveth," with all hearts approving, all voices applauding, and nobody lisps a word that she is out of her sphere. Well, Antoinette Brown believes the sentiment so sang to be the hope of a lost world, and feels herself called to bear witness in behalf of that religion, and to commend His salvation to the understanding and hearts of all who will hear her. Why may she not obey this impulse, and bear the tidings of a world's salvation to those perishing in darkness and sin? What is there unfeminine or revolting in her preaching the truth which Jenny Lind may sing without objection and amid universal applause? Answer by things "in male costumes." Hiss-s-s. Mrs. ERNESTINE L. ROSE: The law declares husband and wife one; and such we all feel that they should be, and must be when the marriage is a true one. Now, why should that same law base their union or oneness on inequality or subjugation? The wife dies and the husband inherits all her property, as is right; but let the husband die, and the greater part of the property is taken from the wife and given to others, even though all that property was earned or inherited by the wife. She may be turned out of the house she was born in and which was hers until marriage, and see it given to her husband's brothers or other kindred who are strangers to her. I insist that the wife should own and inherit the property of the husband just to the same extent that the husband inherits that of the wife--why not? Answer to the aforesaid--Hiss-s-s-s! Bow-ow-ow! HARRIOT K. HUNT: I plant myself on the basis of the Declaration of Independence and insist, with our Revolutionary sires, that taxation without representation is tyranny. Well; here am I, an indepen
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733  
734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
husband
 

property

 

sphere

 

salvation

 

platform

 

hearts

 
inherits
 

marriage

 

insist

 

Answer


indepen
 

objection

 

tyranny

 
oneness
 
declares
 
universal
 

things

 
costumes
 

ERNESTINE

 

applause


kindred

 

strangers

 

brothers

 

inherit

 

HARRIOT

 
extent
 

aforesaid

 
turned
 

greater

 

taxation


inequality

 

subjugation

 

Revolutionary

 

Independence

 
Declaration
 

inherited

 
earned
 

representation

 

commend

 

CHANNING


speech

 

controversy

 

thousands

 
stands
 

understand

 
public
 
bearing
 

position

 
chivalric
 
generous