FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126  
127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   >>   >|  
offer their votes, when it appeared that they were women--that they were of the female sex--the power and authority of the inspectors was at an end. When they act upon a subject upon which they have no discretion, I think there is no judicial authority. There is a large range of discretion in regard to the votes offered by the male sex. If a man offers his vote, there is a question whether he is a minor--whether he is 21 years of age. The subject is within their jurisdiction. If they decide correctly, it is well; if they decide erroneously, they act judicially, and are not liable. If the question is whether the person presenting his vote is a foreigner or naturalized, or whether he has been a resident of the state or district for a sufficient length of time, the subject is all within their jurisdiction, and they have a right to decide, and are protected if they decide wrong. But upon the view which has been taken of this question of the right of females to vote, by the United States Court at Washington, and by the adjudication which was made this morning, upon this subject there is no discretion, and therefore I must hold that it affords no protection. In that view of the case, is there anything to go to the jury? MR. VAN VOORHIS: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: What? MR. VAN VOORHIS: The jury must pass upon the whole case, and particularly as to whether any ballots were received for representative in Congress, or candidates for representative in Congress, and whether the defendants acted wilfully and maliciously. THE COURT: It is too plain to argue that. MR. VAN VOORHIS: There is nothing but circumstantial evidence. THE COURT: Your own witness testified to it. MR. VAN VOORHIS: But "knowingly," your Honor, implies knowing that it is a vote for representative in Congress. THE COURT: That comes within the decision of the question of law. I don't see that there is anything to go to the jury. MR. VAN VOORHIS: I cannot take your Honor's view of the case, but of course must submit to it. We ask to go to the jury upon this whole case, and claim that in this case, as in all criminal cases, the right of trial by jury is made inviolate by the constitution--that the Court has no power to take it from the jury. THE COURT: I am going to submit it to the jury. _Gentlemen of the Jury_: This case is now before you upon the evidence as it stands, and I shall leave the case with you to decide-- MR. VAN VOOR
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126  
127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

VOORHIS

 

decide

 

question

 

subject

 

Congress

 

representative

 

discretion

 
submit
 

authority

 

jurisdiction


evidence
 

received

 

circumstantial

 

defendants

 
candidates
 
stands
 

maliciously

 

wilfully

 

decision

 

inviolate


constitution

 

criminal

 

Gentlemen

 

ballots

 
implies
 

knowing

 

knowingly

 
testified
 

witness

 

offers


offered

 

judicially

 

erroneously

 

correctly

 

regard

 

female

 

appeared

 

inspectors

 
judicial
 

liable


person

 

morning

 

adjudication

 

States

 

Washington

 

affords

 

protection

 

United

 
females
 

resident