FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   >>  
Declaration; second, in that of the Preamble to the Constitution, and the Constitution itself, and its various amendments, to which I have referred: the first, sixth, ninth and tenth, which would have been interpreted male, had the Constitution meant men alone, but which have always been defined to cover, and include woman--to cover and include the rights of the _whole_ people to freedom of conscience, to freedom of speech, to the right of a speedy and public trial, &c., &c., and this, although in the Sixth Amendment, the terms _him_ and _his_ are alone used. The Courts long ago decided that Statutes were of general bearing, as is fully true of the Declaration and Constitution, which are supreme statutes. The Fifteenth Amendment does not specifically exclude right of male citizens to vote, because they are _male_ citizens, therefore, male citizens are of necessity included in the right of voting. It does not specifically exclude female citizens from the right of voting, because they are female citizens, therefore, female citizens are of necessity included in the right of voting--a right which the United States cannot abridge. No male citizen can claim that he, as a male citizen, is included, save by implication, and save on the general grounds that he is not specifically excluded, he is necessarily included. Can the United States, at pleasure, take from its own citizens the right of voting, or abridge that right? Has it the right to take from citizens of States the right of voting? Are citizens of States simply protected against States, and can the United States now, at will, step in and deny or abridge the right of voting to all its male citizens simply because they are male? If it has that power over its female citizens, it has the same power over its male citizens. You cannot fail to see that the question brought up by Miss Anthony's prosecution and trial _by the United States_ for the act of voting, has developed the most important question of United States rights; a larger, most pregnant, more momentous question by far, than that of _State_ rights. The liberties of the people are much more closely involved when the United States is the aggressor, than when the States are aggressors. "The Act to Enforce the right of citizens to vote," declares that CITIZENS shall be entitled and allowed to vote at all elections by the people, in any state, territory, district, county, city, parish, township, school district, munici
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   >>  



Top keywords:

citizens

 

States

 

voting

 

United

 
Constitution
 
included
 

female

 

specifically

 

people

 

question


abridge

 
rights
 

district

 

general

 
necessity
 

Amendment

 
simply
 
exclude
 
freedom
 

Declaration


include

 

citizen

 
pregnant
 

entitled

 

allowed

 
CITIZENS
 

Enforce

 

declares

 
elections
 
township

school
 

munici

 
parish
 
territory
 

county

 

aggressors

 

aggressor

 

developed

 
prosecution
 

Anthony


important

 
larger
 

closely

 

involved

 

liberties

 

momentous

 

brought

 

defined

 

conscience

 

speech