FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82  
83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   >>  
f failures which they have. The failures are provided for in various ways, as Chapter V will explain. No striking differences are observed for the boys and girls in any division of this chapter. A SUMMARY OF CHAPTER IV The percentages of graduates and of non-graduates that fail are almost identical. The percentages of the failing pupils who graduate and of the non-failing pupils who graduate are identical (31.5 per cent); hence, graduation is not perceptibly conditioned by the occurrence of failure. The non-failing non-graduates do not persist long in school, as compared with the failing non-graduates. The short persistence partly accounts for their avoidance of failure. As the number of failures per pupil increase for the failing graduates, the time extension is not commensurate with the number of failures. For 11.5 per cent of the non-graduates who fail in 50 per cent or more of their work, failure is probably a chief cause of dropping out. Failure is probably not a prime cause of dropping out for most of the non-graduates, as 80 per cent have only 5 failures or fewer. The worst consequences of failure are perhaps in acquiring the habit of failing, and in coming to accept one's self as a failure. The number of drop-outs does not tend to increase as the number of failures per pupil increases. The time period for graduating ranges from three to six years, with approximately 79 per cent of all graduates finishing in four years or less. The failing graduates take, on the average, a little longer time than the non-failing, but not an increase that is proportionate to the number of failures. The boys and girls present no striking differences in the facts of Chapter IV. REFERENCES: 33. Wooley, H.T. "Facts About the Working Children of Cincinnati," _Elementary School Teacher_, Vol. XIV, 135. 34. Caldwell, O.W. "Laboratory Method and High School Efficiency," _Popular Science Monthly_, 82-243. 35. King, Irving. _The High School Age._ 36. Book, W.F. "Why Pupils Fail," _Pedagogical Seminary_, 11:204. 37. Bronner, A.E. _The Psychology of Special Abilities and Disabilities_, p. 6. 38. Lewis, W.D. _Democracy's High School_, pp. 28, 37. 39. Hanus, P.H. _School Aims and Values._ 40. Russell, J.E. "Co-education in High School. Is It a Failure?" Reprint from _Good Housekeeping_. 41. Dotey, A.I. _An Investigation of Scholarship Records of High School Pupils_. High School Teachers Associa
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82  
83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   >>  



Top keywords:
graduates
 

School

 
failing
 

failures

 
number
 
failure
 
increase
 

striking

 

Failure

 

dropping


Pupils

 

differences

 

Chapter

 

percentages

 

pupils

 

graduate

 

identical

 

REFERENCES

 

Elementary

 

Cincinnati


Irving

 

Laboratory

 

Working

 

Caldwell

 
Children
 
Method
 

Monthly

 

Wooley

 

Science

 

Teacher


Efficiency

 
Popular
 
education
 

Reprint

 

Values

 

Russell

 

Housekeeping

 

Scholarship

 

Records

 
Teachers

Associa
 
Investigation
 

Psychology

 

Special

 
Abilities
 

Disabilities

 

Bronner

 

Pedagogical

 

Seminary

 
present