FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129  
130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   >>   >|  
, June 10, 1919. [76] Cf. _Bonsoir_, June 20, 1919. [77] On April 27th. [78] _Bonsoir_, June 21, 1919. [79] _The New York Herald_, May 15. 1919. [80] _The New York Herald_ (Paris edition), May 3,1919. [81] _The New York Herald_, June 6, 1919. [82] Cf. _Le Matin_, July 9, 1919. The chief speakers alluded to were MM. Renaudel, Deshayes, Lafont, Paul Meunier, Vandame. [83] _The New York Herald_ (Paris edition), April 29, 1919. [84] Quoted in the Paris _Temps_ of March 28,1919. [85] This explanation deals exclusively with the first advance of the Rumanian army into Hungary. [86] Cabled to _The Public Ledger_ of Philadelphia, April 20,1919. [87] _Bonsoir_, June 21, 1919. [88] Cf. _The Daily News_, July 5,1919. _L'Humanite_, July 8, 1919. [89] Cf. _The New York Herald_ (Paris edition), April 4, 1919. [90] _The Chicago Tribune_ (Paris edition), July 31, 1919. V AIMS AND METHODS The policy of the Anglo-Saxon plenipotentiaries was never put into words. For that reason it has to be judged by their acts, despite the circumstance that these were determined by motives which varied greatly at different times, and so far as one can conjecture were not often practical corollaries of fundamental principles. From these acts one may draw a few conclusions which will enable us to reconstruct such policy as there was. One is that none of the sacrifices imposed upon the members of the League of Nations was obligatory on the Anglo-Saxon peoples. These were beyond the reach of all the new canons which might clash with their interests or run counter to their aspirations. They were the givers and administrators of the saving law rather than its observers. Consequently they were free to hold all that was theirs, however doubtful their title; nay, they were besought to accept a good deal more under the mandatory system, which was molded on their own methods of governance. It was especially taken for granted that the architects would be called to contribute naught to the new structure but their ideas, and that they need renounce none of their possessions, however shady its origin, however galling to the population its retention. It was in deference to this implicit doctrine that President Wilson withdrew without protest or discussion his demand for the freedom of the seas, on which he had been wont to lay such stress. Another way of putting the matter is this. The principal aim of the Conference wa
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129  
130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Herald
 

edition

 

Bonsoir

 
policy
 

Consequently

 

observers

 

doubtful

 

mandatory

 

system

 

molded


besought

 
accept
 

saving

 
administrators
 
peoples
 

obligatory

 

members

 

League

 

Nations

 

Conference


counter

 

aspirations

 

givers

 

canons

 

interests

 
methods
 

discussion

 

protest

 

demand

 

freedom


withdrew

 

implicit

 
doctrine
 

President

 

Wilson

 

putting

 

matter

 

principal

 

Another

 

stress


deference
 
architects
 

called

 

contribute

 

granted

 
governance
 

imposed

 
naught
 
structure
 

origin