FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142  
143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   >>   >|  
character."[115] [Footnote 115: The above extracts are from Judge Woodbury's charge to the Grand-Jury, in Circuit Court of United States, at Boston, taken from the _Evening Traveller_, copying the reprint of Boston Daily Advertiser, of October 25, 1850.] He then tells them that _no feeling of Humanity_ must be allowed to prevent them from executing any law which the court declares to them, "whether the statute is a harsh one, is not for us to determine."[116] _A cruel law is to be enforced as vigorously as a humane one_; an _unjust law_ as a _just one_; a statute which aims to defeat the purpose of Law itself, just as readily as one which aims to secure the dearest rights of humanity. If the statute is notoriously wicked, as in the case supposed, then the Judge says: "It is to be observed that this statute [the fugitive slave bill] subjects no person to arrest who was not before liable to be seized and carried out of the State;" "Congress has enacted this law. _It is imperative, and it will be enforced._ Let no man mistake the mildness and forbearance with which the criminal code is habitually administered, [as in cases of engaging in the slave-trade] for weakness or timidity. _Resistance [to the fugitive slave bill] must make it sternly inflexible._" "As great efforts have been made to convince the public that the recent law [the fugitive slave bill] cannot be enforced with a good conscience, but may be conscientiously resisted ... I deem it proper to advert, briefly, to _the moral aspects_ of the subject." "The States without the constitution would be to each other foreign nations." "Those, therefore, who have the strongest convictions of the _immorality of the institution of slavery_, are not thereby authorized to conclude that the _provision for delivering up fugitive slaves is morally wrong_, [that is, if it be wrong to hold man in bondage, it is also not wrong,] or that our Fathers ... did not act wisely, justly, and humanely in acceding to the compacts of the Constitution." "Even those who go to the extreme of condemning the Constitution and the laws made under it, as _unjust and immoral_, cannot ... justify resistance. In their view, such laws are inconsistent with the justice and benevolence and against the will of the Supreme Lawgiver, and they emphatically ask, '_Which shall we obey, the law of man, or the Will of God?_' I answer, 'OBEY BOTH!' The _incompatibility_ which the question assumes [between
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142  
143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
statute
 

fugitive

 

enforced

 
States
 

Boston

 

Constitution

 

unjust

 

slavery

 

conscience

 

convictions


immorality

 
institution
 

conclude

 
convince
 
slaves
 

public

 

recent

 

strongest

 

provision

 

delivering


authorized

 

aspects

 

subject

 

briefly

 

advert

 
conscientiously
 

proper

 

constitution

 

nations

 

foreign


morally

 

resisted

 
Lawgiver
 

emphatically

 

Supreme

 

inconsistent

 

justice

 

benevolence

 

incompatibility

 

question


assumes
 
answer
 

wisely

 

justly

 

humanely

 
Fathers
 

bondage

 
acceding
 
compacts
 

immoral