FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278  
279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   >>   >|  
o tamper with the earnings of his spinners, and never consents to reduce them till absolutely forced to it by a want of remuneration for the capital and skill embarked in his business" (_Philosophy of Manufactures_, p. 330). This does not, however, prevent Dr. Ure from pointing out a little later the grave danger into which trade-union endeavours to raise wages drive a trade subject to the competition of "the more frugal and docile labour of the Continent and United States" (p. 363). Nor do Dr. Ure's statements regarding the high wages paid in cotton-mills, which he places at three times the agricultural wages, tally with the statistics given in the appendix of his own book (cf. p. 515). Male spinners alone received the "high wages" he names, and out of them had to pay for the labour of the assistants whom they hired to help them. [228] _Der Grossbetrieb_, p. 132. In regarding the advance of recent average wages it should be borne in mind that the later years contain a larger proportion of adults. In considering the net yearly wages a deduction for unemployment should be made from the sums named in the table. [229] Account must be taken of the depressed condition of hand-loom weavers, who had not yet disappeared. [230] Here Schulze-Gaevernitz appears to strain his argument. Though official reports lay stress upon the silver question as an important factor in the rise of Bombay mills, there seems no doubt of the ability of Bombay cheap labour, independently of this, to undersell English labour for low counts of cotton in Asiatic markets. Brentano in his work, _Hours and Wages in Relation to Production_, supports Schulze-Gaevernitz. [231] Mr. Gould's general conclusion, from his comparison of American and European production, is "that higher daily wages in America _do not mean a correspondingly enhanced labour-cost to the manufacturers_" (_Contemporary Review_, Jan. 1893). This he holds to be partly due to superior mechanical agencies, which owe their existence to high wages, partly to superior physical force in the workers. But Mr. Gould's evidence and his conclusion here stated, taken as testimony to the "economy of high wages," are insufficient, for they only show that high wages are attended by increased output of labour, not by an increase _correspondent_ to this higher wage. [232] Ure's _Philosophy of Manufactures_, pp. 367-369. Dr. Ure regarded mechanical inventions as the means whereby capital should k
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278  
279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

labour

 

Gaevernitz

 

partly

 

superior

 

mechanical

 

Bombay

 
Schulze
 
higher
 

conclusion

 
cotton

spinners
 

Philosophy

 
Manufactures
 

capital

 

English

 

undersell

 
inventions
 
independently
 

Relation

 

regarded


Asiatic

 
markets
 

Brentano

 

ability

 
counts
 

official

 

reports

 
stress
 
Though
 

argument


appears

 

strain

 

silver

 

Production

 

factor

 

important

 

question

 

insufficient

 

agencies

 

attended


evidence

 

testimony

 

workers

 

economy

 

existence

 
physical
 
increased
 

output

 
comparison
 

American