FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189  
190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   >>   >|  
an be no doubt that it is not the fictitious object of love which is conclusive, but the emotion of the lover: the sensualist can approach God and the Virgin with inflamed senses, but to the lover every woman is divine. The result of this chapter is as far as our investigation is concerned, negative. The deifying love of man has no parallel phenomenon in the emotional life of woman. (_b_) SEXUAL MYSTICS. Sexual mysticism is a contradiction in itself, because true mysticism has nothing whatever to do with sexuality. But frequently suppressed sexuality, secretly luxuriating, takes possession of the whole soul, and a religious construction is put on the results. The sexually excited subject attributes religious motives to his ecstasy. I have no hesitation in asserting that the majority of these ecstasies--especially in the case of women--are rooted in sexuality, and that this so-called mysticism is nothing but a deviation or wrong interpretation of the sexual impulse. The same thing applies to the flagellants of the declining Middle Ages, and some Protestant sects of modernity. The raptures of St. Teresa and Madame Guyon, also, belong to this category, however much the fact may be concealed by pseudo-religious conceptions. I have no doubt that Eastern mysticism, too, grew up on a sexual foundation, but (as I have done all along) I will limit my subject to the civilisation of Europe. This counterfeit mysticism, fed from dubious sources and calling itself love of God, taints the pure intuitions of some of the genuine mystics and metaphysical erotics; they were not always able to steer clear of spurious outgrowths. (Here, too, the psychological naivete of mediaeval times must to some extent be held responsible.) Conspicuous amongst these is St. Bernard of Clairvaux, who in his _Sermones in Canticum_ took the "Song of Songs" as a base for mystically-sexual imaginings. There is nothing really new in this direction. But I will cite a few stanzas written by St. Bernard which might equally well have come from one of the amorous nuns: TO THE SIDE-WOUND OF CHRIST. Lord, with my mouth I touch and worship Thee, With all the strength I have I cling to Thee, With all my love I plunge my heart in Thee, My very life blood would I draw from Thee, Oh, Jesus! Jesus! Draw me unto Thee! How sweet Thy savour is! Who tastes of Thee, Oh, Jesus Christ, can relish naught but Thee!
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189  
190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

mysticism

 

religious

 

sexual

 

sexuality

 

subject

 

Bernard

 
Sermones
 
mediaeval
 

Canticum

 

extent


naivete

 

Clairvaux

 

responsible

 

Conspicuous

 

calling

 

sources

 

taints

 

intuitions

 

dubious

 
civilisation

Europe

 

counterfeit

 

genuine

 

mystics

 

spurious

 

outgrowths

 

metaphysical

 

erotics

 
psychological
 

plunge


worship

 

strength

 

tastes

 

Christ

 

relish

 
naught
 

savour

 

direction

 

stanzas

 

written


mystically

 
imaginings
 

equally

 

CHRIST

 

amorous

 

Madame

 
frequently
 

contradiction

 

Sexual

 
emotional