FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214  
215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   >>  
also be its end. It is here, in the voluntary surrender of life in order to attain a divined unity, and not in the union of begetting and destroying, that the frequently assumed connection between love and death is to be found. Voluptuousness and death are not interlinked, as is so frequently asserted since Novalis (not on the higher plane of eroticism), but voluptuousness has immolated itself, has been annihilated in the love-death. The view that begetting and destroying are related functions, is based on the supposition that love is bound up with propagation. This is the fateful error of the modern theory of love, a rationalistic, metaphysical abstraction, which touches no corresponding chord in the human soul. To base the relationship of love and death on an association of becoming and declining is a beautiful idea, but nothing more. Modern synthetic love produces this relationship in its metaphysical perfection out of itself; it is foreign alike to pure sexuality and to spiritual love. (Wherever the desire to destroy is found hand in hand with sensuality, morbid instincts are at play.) It frequently occurs that lovers commit suicide together because external circumstances prevent their union. This is a step corresponding to suicide from offended vanity or incurable disease; life has become unbearable to the individual haunted by a fixed idea, and he throws it away. But this has nothing whatever to do with the love-death; it is a purely negative act of despair, whereas the love-death is an altogether positive act, namely, the will to win to a higher (and to the intellect inconceivable and paradoxical) metaphysical unity. The love-death aspires to perform a miracle. It has, possibly, never been realised in its full greatness; the evidence of the common death of Heinrich von Kleist and Henrietta Vogel must be rejected. During the last days of his life Kleist was wrapped up in the idea of their common death, and in a letter to his cousin, Marie von Kleist, he says: "If you could only realise how death and love strive to beautify these last moments of my life with heavenly and earthly roses, you would be content to let me die. I swear to you I am supremely happy." In the same letter he speaks of "the most voluptuous of deaths." And yet it was no real love-death, that is to say, death following as a necessary corollary in order that love may be consummated. Kleist as well as Henrietta had separately resolved to commit
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214  
215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   >>  



Top keywords:

Kleist

 

frequently

 

metaphysical

 

common

 

Henrietta

 

suicide

 
commit
 
relationship
 

letter

 

begetting


destroying

 

higher

 

Heinrich

 

During

 

rejected

 

paradoxical

 

altogether

 

positive

 

despair

 
purely

negative

 

intellect

 

realised

 

greatness

 

possibly

 

miracle

 

inconceivable

 

wrapped

 
aspires
 

perform


evidence

 

heavenly

 

voluptuous

 

deaths

 

speaks

 
supremely
 

separately

 

resolved

 

consummated

 

corollary


realise

 
strive
 

beautify

 

moments

 

content

 

earthly

 
cousin
 

occurs

 

propagation

 
fateful