FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43  
44   45   46   47   >>  
ill come slowly and will not be a solid injection engine." Henry M. Mullinnix (former chief of powerplant section, Navy Bureau of Aeronautics): The advantages of compression-ignition, including reduced fire hazard, more efficient cycle, elimination of electrical apparatus and hence of radio interference, elimination of carburetion problems, and other benefits less evident, would seem to outweigh the difficulties encountered in metering and injecting minute quantities of fuel at the proper instant. Although the Diesel engine suffers upon comparison with the Otto cycle engine in flexibility there seems to be a definite field for employment of Diesels and a gradual extension of their use may be predicted. John H. Geisse (chief engineer, Comet Engine Corporation): "I am firmly convinced that the Diesel engine in the future will not only maintain the advantages of Diesel engines as they are now known, but will also be lighter in pounds per horsepower than the present Otto engines." Lt. Cdr. C. G. McCord (U.S. Navy, Naval Aircraft Factory): "The use of compression ignition in due time appears to be assured; but increase in weights above those of present Otto cycle engines, to insure reliability, must be expected." L. M. Woolson (aeronautical engineer, Packard Motor Car Company): "There is no question that the compression ignition aircraft engine will in time offer severe competition to the gasoline engine. There are, however, many basic problems to be solved for the solution of which there exists no precedent." N. N. Tilley (chief engineer, Kinner Airplane and Motor Corp.): Considerable development of the compression ignition type of engine for aircraft will be required before it is commonly available. It is believed that the weight per horsepower must be equal to, or less than, that of the present type of engines, in order to interest the public, since rapid take-off, rate of climb, and speed are desired, rather than low fuel consumption or high mileage. Most flights are of few hours duration. It is believed that flights must be of over five or six hours duration in order to show any advantage of Diesel engines (with low fuel consumption) if appreciably heavier than present engines. Also the difference between Otto cycle and Diesel becomes slight as the compression ratios come closer together. Comments of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43  
44   45   46   47   >>  



Top keywords:
engine
 

engines

 

Diesel

 

compression

 

ignition

 

present

 
engineer
 
believed
 
horsepower
 

aircraft


consumption

 

duration

 

elimination

 
advantages
 

flights

 

problems

 

heavier

 

appreciably

 

competition

 

Comments


gasoline

 

severe

 

solved

 

solution

 
insure
 

reliability

 

question

 

Company

 
Woolson
 

Packard


closer

 

ratios

 
aeronautical
 

expected

 
slight
 

difference

 

Tilley

 

public

 
interest
 

mileage


desired
 
weight
 

Considerable

 

advantage

 

development

 

Airplane

 
precedent
 

Kinner

 

required

 

commonly