FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   >>  
ce use.... Flight tests, until the durability of the engine is improved, be limited to a determination of the critical engine speeds, and to short hops in seaplanes.... It is believed that this size engine should be made suitable for service use before this type in a larger class is attempted." This latter statement probably refers to the 400-hp model. A year had passed between the making of engine 100 and 120, yet the reliability had not improved. Although unreliability was the immediate cause of failure, there were two design defects which would have doomed the engine even if it had been reliable. All the Packard diesels were of the 4-stroke cycle unblown type, yet the most successful airplane diesels were of the 2-stroke cycle blown type.[30] The advantages of the latter type for aeronautical use are that it is of a more compact engine, of lower weight and greater efficiency.[31] The engine was therefore built around the wrong cycle. The Packard diesel of 1928 was designed to compete with the Wright J-5 "Whirlwind" which powered Lindbergh's "Spirit of St. Louis" in 1927.[32] The specifications were within two percent of each other. The diesel engine's fuel consumption was far less although its price was considerably higher. _Packard Diesel_ _Wright J-5_ _DR-980_ _"Whirlwind"_ Diameter (in.) 45-11/16 45 Horsepower 225 225 Weight (lb) 510 510 Weight-horsepower ratio 2.26 2.26 Fuel consumption (lb per hp/hr at 0.40 0.60 cruising). Cost $4025 $3000 The advantages of lower fuel cost and greater cruising range offered by the diesel engine would be relatively unimportant to a private pilot flying for pleasure, but would be vital to the commercial operator using airplanes powered by engines having several times the horsepower of the Packard diesel. Its size, moreover, was too small for the technology of fuel injectors.[33] The Packard Company realized that the production engine was too small.[34] In 1930 a 400-hp version was built but was not put into production, probably because of the unreliability of the 225-hp model. The fourth principal reason why the engine failed is explain
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   >>  



Top keywords:

engine

 
Packard
 

diesel

 

unreliability

 

horsepower

 

Weight

 
greater
 

production

 

consumption

 
cruising

diesels

 
stroke
 

advantages

 

powered

 
Wright
 
improved
 
Whirlwind
 

considerably

 

higher

 
Horsepower

Diameter

 

Diesel

 

Company

 

realized

 

injectors

 

technology

 

version

 
reason
 

failed

 

explain


principal
 
fourth
 
offered
 

unimportant

 

private

 
flying
 
airplanes
 

engines

 

operator

 

pleasure


commercial

 
passed
 

refers

 

statement

 

attempted

 

making

 

failure

 
Although
 

reliability

 
larger