FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42  
43   44   45   46   47   >>  
fore the Packard diesel received its approved-type certificate. They were in answer to the question, "What is your opinion of the probable early future of the compression ignition type of engine in aircraft powerplants?" Most of the engineers were enthusiastic about the diesel engine's future in aviation; however, neither George J. Mead nor C. Fayette Taylor shared their colleagues' opinions. Mead's prophesy was accurate except for his discounting the diesel's role in lighter-than-air craft. Taylor was correct in implying that there was a future for the diesel in powering airships. George J. Mead (vice president and technical director, Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Company): Compared with the present Otto cycle engine, the Diesel powerplant weight, including fuel for a long-distance flight, would apparently be less. It is doubtful whether there would be any saving if the orthodox engine were operated on a more suitable fuel. Inherently the Diesel engine must stand higher pressures and therefore is heavier per horsepower. A partial solution of this difficulty is the two-cycle operation, which seems almost a requirement if the Diesel cycle is to be considered at all for aircraft. For any normal commercial operation in the United States there seems to be little or no improvement to be had from the Diesel. After all, it is not entirely a question of fuel cost but payloads carried for a given horsepower. It seemed at one time as though the Diesel was particularly desirable for Zeppelin work. Now that blau gas has been introduced, which obviates the need of valving precious lifting gas, the Diesel cycle seems much less interesting for this purpose. There may be a reduction in fire hazard and radio interference with the Diesel cycle, but it is doubtful whether it will be used in view of these considerations alone. C. Fayette Taylor (professor of aeronautical engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology): "I believe that the compression ignition engine will continue to remain in the experimental stage during the year 1930. I should expect its first really practical installation to be in lighter-than-air craft." P. B. Taylor (acting chief engineer, Wright Aeronautical Corporation): "I believe the compression ignition engine is probably the type which will eventually supersede the present electric ignition units. This development w
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42  
43   44   45   46   47   >>  



Top keywords:
engine
 

Diesel

 

ignition

 

Taylor

 

diesel

 

future

 
compression
 
horsepower
 
lighter
 

question


aircraft

 

George

 

doubtful

 
operation
 

Fayette

 

present

 

valving

 

interesting

 

precious

 

lifting


payloads

 

carried

 

purpose

 

introduced

 
desirable
 

Zeppelin

 

obviates

 

aeronautical

 
acting
 

installation


practical

 

expect

 
engineer
 

Wright

 
development
 

electric

 

supersede

 

Aeronautical

 
Corporation
 

eventually


considerations
 
interference
 

reduction

 

hazard

 

professor

 

remain

 
experimental
 

continue

 

Technology

 

engineering