FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842  
843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   >>   >|  
and the continued existence of the society was sufficient reason why a precedent once set should continue to be followed. I say that the oldest religious and political institutions present a close analogy. It would be more correct to say that they were parts of one whole of social custom. Religion was a part of the organised social life into which a man was born, and to which he conformed through life in the same unconscious way in which men fall into any habitual practice of the society in which they live. Men took the gods and their worship for granted, just as they took the other usages of the state for granted, and if they reasoned or speculated about them, they did so on the presupposition that the traditional usages were fixed things, behind which their reasonings must not go, and which no reasoning could be allowed to overturn. To us moderns religion is above all a matter of individual conviction and reasoned belief, but to the ancients it was a part of the citizen's public life, reduced to fixed forms, which he was not bound to understand and was not at liberty to criticise or to neglect. Religious non-conformity was an offence against the state; for if sacred tradition was tampered with the bases of society were undermined, and the favour of the gods was forfeited. But so long as the prescribed forms were duly observed, a man was recognised as truly pious, and no one asked how his religion was rooted in his heart or affected his reason. Like political duty, of which indeed it was a part, religion was entirely comprehended in the observance of certain fixed rules of outward conduct. From the antique point of view, indeed, the question what the gods are in themselves is not a religious but a speculative one; what is requisite to religion is a practical acquaintance with the rules on which the deity acts and on which he expects his worshippers to frame their conduct--what in II Kings 17:26 is called the "manner" or rather the "customary law" (_mishpat_) of the god of the land. This is true even of the religion of Israel. When the prophets speak of the knowledge of God, they always mean a practical knowledge of the laws and principles of His government in Israel, and a summary expression for religion as a whole is "the knowledge and fear of Jehovah," i.e., the knowledge of what Jehovah prescribes, combined with a reverent obedience. The traditional usages of religion had grown up gradually in the course of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842  
843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

religion

 

knowledge

 
usages
 

society

 
practical
 

conduct

 
granted
 

reasoned

 

reason

 
traditional

Israel

 

Jehovah

 
social
 

political

 

religious

 

affected

 

rooted

 

speculative

 

forfeited

 
requisite

recognised

 
acquaintance
 

comprehended

 

outward

 

observed

 

observance

 

prescribed

 

antique

 

question

 

manner


summary

 

expression

 

government

 
principles
 
prescribes
 

gradually

 

combined

 

reverent

 

obedience

 

called


favour
 

expects

 

worshippers

 

customary

 

prophets

 
mishpat
 

ancients

 

unconscious

 

conformed

 

custom