FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160  
161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   >>   >|  
satirical, at least more directly so. The _Moria_, as a satire, is philosophical and general; the _Colloquia_ are up to date and special. At the same time they combine more the positive and negative elements. In the _Moria_ Erasmus's own ideal dwells unexpressed behind the representation; in the _Colloquia_ he continually and clearly puts it in the foreground. On this account they form, notwithstanding all the jests and mockery, a profoundly serious moral treatise and are closely akin to the _Enchiridion militis Christiani_. What Erasmus really demanded of the world and of mankind, how he pictured to himself that passionately desired, purified Christian society of good morals, fervent faith, simplicity and moderation, kindliness, toleration and peace--this we can nowhere else find so clearly and well-expressed as in the _Colloquia_. In these last fifteen years of his life Erasmus resumes, by means of a series of moral-dogmatic disquisitions, the topics he broached in the _Enchiridion_: the exposition of simple, general Christian conduct; untrammelled and natural ethics. That is his message of redemption. It came to many out of _Exomologesis_, _De esu carnium_, _Lingua_, _Institutio christiani matrimonii_, _Vidua christiana_, _Ecclesiastes_. But, to far larger numbers, the message was contained in the _Colloquies_. The _Colloquia_ gave rise to much more hatred and contest than the _Moria_, and not without reason, for in them Erasmus attacked persons. He allowed himself the pleasure of ridiculing his Louvain antagonists. Lee had already been introduced as a sycophant and braggart into the edition of 1519, and when the quarrel was assuaged, in 1522, the reference was expunged. Vincent Dirks was caricatured in _The Funeral_ (1526) as a covetous friar, who extorts from the dying testaments in favour of his order. He remained. Later sarcastic observations were added about Beda and numbers of others. The adherents of Oecolampadius took a figure with a long nose in the _Colloquies_ for their leader: 'Oh, no,' replied Erasmus, 'it is meant for quite another person.' Henceforth all those who were at loggerheads with Erasmus, and they were many, ran the risk of being pilloried in the _Colloquia_. It was no wonder that this work, especially with its scourging mockery of the monastic orders, became the object of controversy. * * * * * Erasmus never emerged from his polemics. He was, no doubt, se
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160  
161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Erasmus
 

Colloquia

 

mockery

 
Colloquies
 
Enchiridion
 
numbers
 

Christian

 

general

 

message

 

allowed


assuaged
 
quarrel
 

reference

 

expunged

 

hatred

 

covetous

 

Funeral

 

caricatured

 

Vincent

 

contest


edition
 

antagonists

 

ridiculing

 
pleasure
 

Louvain

 
persons
 
attacked
 

braggart

 

contained

 

introduced


sycophant

 

reason

 
pilloried
 
person
 

Henceforth

 
loggerheads
 

scourging

 

emerged

 

polemics

 

controversy


monastic

 

orders

 
object
 

observations

 
sarcastic
 
larger
 

remained

 

testaments

 
favour
 

adherents