FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241  
242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   >>  
d 150),[354] Hisham-bin-Abdul Malik (died 213 A.H.),[355] and Abul Mo'tamar Soleiman (died 143 A.H.[356])[357] have not inserted the portion of the tradition of Maria the Coptic maid being sent by the Egyptian Governor to Mohammad. The tradition narrated by Ibn Sad--(1) through Wakidi and Abd-ul-Hamid from Jafar, (2) and Abdullah bin Abdur Rahman bin Abi Sasata--is undoubtedly apocryphal, Wakidi and Abd-ul-Hamid are of impeached integrity, or no authority at all. Ibn Khallikan, in his Biographical Dictionary, translated by Slane, writes regarding Wakidi:--"The Traditions received from him are considered of feeble authority, and doubts have been expressed on the subject of his (_veracity_.)"[358] Ibn Hajar Askalani writes regarding Wakidi in his _Takrib_, that "he has been struck off as an authority (literally left out), notwithstanding his vast knowledge." Zahabi's opinion of Wakidi in Mizan-al-Etedal is that Ahmed bin Hanbal said "he was the greatest liar." Bokhari and Abu Hatim say he is struck off (or left out as an authority). Regarding Abd-ul-Hamid, Zahabi writes that Abu Hatim said he is not quoted as an authority, and Sofian said he was a weak authority. Jafar and Abdullah bin Abdur Rahman bin Abi Sasata are of the middle period in the Tabaeen's class, and do not quote their authority on the subject. [Sidenote: Maria neither a slave;] 10. (2) Supposing that the Governor of Egypt had sent two Coptic maids, with other presents, to Mohammad, it does not follow necessarily that they were slave-girls. It is never stated in history that they were captives of war, or, if they were so, that they were enslaved subsequently. There is no authority for a haphazard conjecture that they were slave-girls. [Sidenote: nor a concubine-slave.] 11. (3) Even if it be admitted that Maria the Coptic was a slave-girl, there is no proof that she was a concubine-slave. It is a stereotyped fabrication of traditionists, and the unpardonable blunder on the part of European writers, that they almost always confound female-slaves, and even sometimes captives, with concubine-slaves. None of the six standard collectors of traditions--Imams Bokhari (died 256 A.H.), Muslim (died 261 A.H.), Aboo Daood (died 275 A.H.), Tirmizee (died 279 A.H.), Nasaee (died 303 A.H.), and Ibn Maja (died 273 A.H.)--has narrated that Maria the Coptic was a concubine-slave of the Prophet. Even the early biographers--Ibn Ishak (died 150 A.H.) and Ibn Hisham
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241  
242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   >>  



Top keywords:

authority

 

Wakidi

 
concubine
 

Coptic

 
writes
 

slaves

 

captives

 
struck
 

Zahabi

 

Bokhari


subject

 

Sidenote

 

narrated

 
Hisham
 

Mohammad

 

tradition

 
Governor
 

Sasata

 

Rahman

 

Abdullah


necessarily
 

admitted

 
stereotyped
 
follow
 

enslaved

 
stated
 

history

 

subsequently

 

fabrication

 

conjecture


haphazard

 

Tirmizee

 

Muslim

 
Nasaee
 

biographers

 

Prophet

 

traditions

 

writers

 

European

 

unpardonable


blunder

 

confound

 
female
 

standard

 

collectors

 

traditionists

 

Askalani

 

Takrib

 

veracity

 
Egyptian