FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243  
244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   >>  
literature;[361] and Katada (died 117 A.H.) was not a contemporary witness of what he relates. Thus he fails in giving any authority to his narration. There are two more traditions in Ibn Sad from similar authorities like Katada, namely, Zohri (died 124 A.H.) and Mak-hool (died 118 A.H.)--not contemporaries of Mohammad, but of the class of Tabaeen--to the effect that Mohammad had said, "Had Ibrahim lived, the capitation-tax would have been remitted to every Copt!" and that "Had Ibrahim lived, his maternal uncles would never have been enslaved!" They do not say who was Ibrahim! Another and the last tradition in Ibn Sad through Yahia bin Hammad, Abu Avana, Soleiman-al-Aamash, Muslim, and Bara is to the effect that Ibrahim was born from a Coptic maid of the Prophet. The narrator Soleiman-al-Aamash was a _modallis_ (_Takrib_ in loco), or in other words, a liar. Besides the whole chain of the narration is _Mo-an-an_. In none of the canonical collections of traditions like those of Bokhari, Muslim, and others Ibrahim is said to have been born of Maria. Therefore any of their traditions regarding Ibrahim is not against us. It is also related in some genuine traditions that an eclipse of the sun took place on the day of Ibrahim's death.[362] The historians have related only one eclipse, which occurred in the sixth year of the Hejira, when Mohammad was at Hodeibia. This shows that Ibrahim could not be Maria's son. She only could come to Arabia a year later, as the dispatches to several princes were sent only in the seventh year. Yafaee, in his history _Mirat-uz-Zaman_, has noted that the sun was eclipsed in the sixth year of the Hejira. In the tenth year, he says,--"A genuine tradition has that the sun was eclipsed on the day of Ibrahim's death, and it has been stated above that it was eclipsed in the sixth year. There is some difficulty. It was noted once only during the time of the Prophet. If it occurred twice, there is no difficulty; and if not, one of these two events must be wrong, either the eclipse took place in the tenth year, or the Prophet's son died in the sixth year." But historically the eclipse was noticed only in the sixth year. There are different dates of Ibrahim's death reported by the biographers--the fourth, tenth, and fourteenth of lunar months, but in none of them can an eclipse take place. [Sidenote: The story of Haphsa and Maria a spurious one.] 13. (5) Lastly, I have to notice the infamous cal
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243  
244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   >>  



Top keywords:

Ibrahim

 

eclipse

 

traditions

 

eclipsed

 
Mohammad
 

Prophet

 

difficulty

 

Aamash

 
Muslim
 

Soleiman


tradition
 
Hejira
 

Katada

 

narration

 

effect

 

related

 

genuine

 

occurred

 

Hodeibia

 

seventh


Arabia
 

dispatches

 

Yafaee

 

history

 

princes

 

Sidenote

 
months
 
biographers
 

fourth

 
fourteenth

Haphsa

 

notice

 
infamous
 

Lastly

 

spurious

 
reported
 
stated
 

events

 

noticed

 

historically


maternal

 

remitted

 

contemporary

 
witness
 

capitation

 
uncles
 

Another

 

enslaved

 

relates

 
similar